Mackenzie v. Canada (Attorney General)

Mackenzie v. Canada (Attorney General)
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2004-01-26
Neutral citation
2004 FCA 37
File numbers
A-221-03
Decision Content
Date: 20040126
Docket: A-221-03
Citation: 2004 FCA 37
CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
SHARLOW J.A.
MALONE J.A.
BETWEEN:
DONALD MACKENZIE
Applicant
and
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia on January 26, 2004.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia on January 26, 2004.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
Date: 20040126
Docket: A-221-03
Citation: 2004 FCA 37
CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
SHARLOW J.A.
MALONE J.A.
BETWEEN:
DONALD MACKENZIE
Applicant
and
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia on January 26, 2004)
ROTHSTEIN J.A.
[1] In spite of counsel's argument, we have not been persuaded that the Umpire erred in concluding that there was no basis for interfering with the decision of the Board of Referees. The application for judicial review is dismissed.
(Sgd.) "Marshall E. Rothstein"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-221-03
STYLE OF CAUSE: DONALD MACKENZIE
- and -
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
PLACE OF HEARING: Vancouver, BC
DATE OF HEARING: January 26, 2004
JUDGMENT AND REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF: ROTHSTEIN, J.A.
APPEARANCES:
GREGORY P. BRUCE for APPLICANT
CURTIS WORKUN for RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Gregory P. Bruce for APPLICANT
Vancouver
Morris Rosenberg for RESPONDENT
Deputy Attorney General of Canada