Alcindor v. Canada (Attorney General)

Alcindor v. Canada (Attorney General)
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2006-03-07
Neutral citation
2006 FCA 95
File numbers
A-170-04
Decision Content
Date: 20060307
Docket: A-170-04
Citation: 2006 FCA 95
Between:
CHRISTIAN ALCINDOR
Applicant
AND
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER
[1] This is an assessment in writing of the bill of costs of the Attorney General of Canada, following a judgment dated December 9, 2004, dismissing the application for judicial review.
[2] In his submissions, the applicant argues that the assessment is premature given that an agreement has been reached. However, since the parties did not agree on the terms of repayment, this agreement sets out in paragraph 6 that the respondent would [translation] “proceed with the assessment of the bill of costs and the recovery of the assessed costs less any sums previously paid”. Under the circumstances, the respondent is entitled to an assessment of costs, and my role is to determine their amount.
[3] The fees are awarded in the amount of $2,140 for the following items of Tariff B: 2 (7 units), 13 (4 units), 14 (2 units/hour X 1hr 55min) and 26 (3 units). I am granting the number units requested under section 2 because of the amount of work involved in preparing the respondent’s record. Because I am not persuaded of the complexity of the issues raised in the application for judicial review, I have reduced the number of units for sections 13 and 14 accordingly. Although this was challenged, I consider 3 units for services rendered with respect to the assessment of costs to be reasonable compensation for the respondent. As for section 24, the applicant is correct in pointing out that only the Court may award fees to counsel for attendance at the hearing.
[4] Based on the evidence, disbursements are allowed in the amount of $315.78: $256.25 for photocopies and $59.53 for bailiff services. I accept the plaintiff’s argument that the service of the Notice of Appearance could have been performed according to one of the modes set out in section 140 of the Federal Court Rules and accordingly disallow the amount of $35.65. The costs incurred for taxis on December 9, 2004, are also disallowed, because they constitute, in my opinion, operating costs not recoverable at the assessment level.
[5] The respondent's costs are therefore assessed and allowed in the amount of $2,455.78. A certificate is issued for that amount.
DATED AT MONTRÉAL, THE 7th DAY OF MARCH 2006
Signed: “Michelle Lamy”
MICHELLE LAMY
ASSESSMENT OFFICER
Certified true translation
Francie Gow
FEDERAL COURT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
COURT DOCKET NO.: A-170-04
Between:
CHRISTIAN ALCINDOR
Applicant
AND
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN WRITING
PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal, Quebec
REASONS OF MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER
DATE OF REASONS: March 7, 2006
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
John Sims
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa, Ontario for the respondent