Beaulne v. Canada (Public Service Alliance)

Beaulne v. Canada (Public Service Alliance)
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2010-05-28
Neutral citation
2010 FCA 141
File numbers
A-91-09
Decision Content
Federal Court of Appeal
Cour d’appel fédérale
Date: 20100528
Docket: A-91-09
Citation: 2010 FCA 141
[ENGLISH TRANSLATION]
Present: PELLETIER J.A.
BETWEEN:
LUC BEAULNE
Applicant
and
PUBLIC SERVICE ALLIANCE OF CANADA
Respondent
Written motion decided without appearance of parties.
Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on May 28, 2010.
REASONS FOR ORDER BY: PELLETIER J. A.
Federal Court of Appeal
Cour d’appel fédérale
Date: 20100528
Docket: A-91-09
Citation: 2010 FCA 141
Present: PELLETIER J.A.
BETWEEN:
LUC BEAULNE
Applicant
and
PUBLIC SERVICE ALLIANCE OF CANADA
Respondent
REASONS FOR ORDER
PELLETIER J.A.
[1] This is a motion by the respondent, the Public Service Alliance of Canada, to strike certain portions of Mr. Beaulne’s affidavit, which was filed in support of his application for judicial review. This motion was unnecessarily challenged by a motion by Mr. Beaulne to have the respondent’s motion dismissed.
[2] The respondent’s motion seeks the striking out of various paragraphs of Mr. Beaulne’s affidavit and related exhibits. Chantal Homier-Nehmé’s affidavit mentions the various reasons for which the respondent objects to the receipt of the disputed paragraphs and documents. The affidavit submitted by Mr. Beaulne’s representative does not contradict any of Ms. Homier-Nehmé’s statements. It is therefore logical that the facts that she outlines are true.
[3] Mr. Beaulne is seeking a judicial review of a decision by the Public Service Staff Relations Board, before which there was an adversarial context. It is settled case law that the record before the reviewing court is the record that was, or was compiled, before the lower tribunal (see Association of Architects (Ont.) v. Association of Architectural Technologists (Ont.), 2002 FCA 218, [2003] 1 F.C. 331. In general, this case consists of pleadings, exhibits and, if they exist, transcripts. These elements are submitted to the reviewing court through the applicant’s affidavit.
[4] In this case, the applicant’s affidavit contains numerous documents that were not before the Public Service Staff Relations Board either because it refused to admit them or because they were created after the hearing before the Board. None of these documents or paragraphs of Mr. Beaulne’s affidavit referenced therein, listed in the draft order in Tab 15 of the applicant’s record, are admissible for the purposes of the application for judicial review.
[5] There will therefore be an order that the Registry strike the following portions of Mr. Beaulne’s affidavit by deleting them with black pencil:
- Exhibits 7, 11, 12(a) and pages 76 and 77 of Exhibit 8;
- Exhibits 12(b) 14, 15, 16, 17 and 20;
- Paragraphs 5, 6, 10 and 18 of the affidavit.
[6] Given the respondent’s delay in objecting to these irregularities, there shall be no order with respect to costs.
“J.D. Denis Pelletier”
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-91-09
STYLE OF CAUSE: LUC BEAULNE and PUBLIC SERVICE ALLIANCE OF CANADA
WRITTEN MOTION DECIDED WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES
REASONS FOR ORDER BY: PELLETIER J.A.
DATED: MAY 28, 2010
WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY:
ROBERT DOUCET
FOR THE APPLICANT
JAMES CAMERON
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
CENTRE HOSPITALIER MÉMORIAL DE WAKEFIELD
WAKEFIELD, QUÉBEC
FOR THE APPLICANT
RAVEN, CAMERON, BALLANTYNE & YAZBECK LLP
OTTAWA, ONTARIO
FOR THE RESPONDENT