Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2002

Editions Progitech Inc. v. Canada

2002 FCA 19
AdministrativeJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Editions Progitech Inc. v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2002-01-16 Neutral citation 2002 FCA 19 File numbers A-168-99 Decision Content Date: 20020116 Docket: A-168-99 Montréal, Quebec, January 16, 2002 CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A. DÉCARY J.A. NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: LES EDITIONS PROGITECH INC. Plaintiff and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Defendants JUDGMENT The application for judicial review is dismissed with costs. Alice Desjardins J.A. Certified true translation Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L. Trad. a. Date: 20020116 Docket: A-168-99 Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 19 CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A. DÉCARY J.A. NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: LES EDITIONS PROGITECH INC. Plaintiff and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Defendants Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec on January 16, 2002. Judgment from the bench at Montréal, Quebec on January 16, 2002. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DESJARDINS J.A. Date: 20020116 Docket: A-168-99 Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 19 CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A. DÉCARY J.A. NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: LES EDITIONS PROGITECH INC. Plaintiff and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Defendants REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec on January 16, 2002) DESJARDINS J.A. [1] We consider that the trial judge (see Editions Progitech Inc. v. Canada, [1999] 99 D.T.C. 672, [1999] T.C.J. No. 92 (QL)) made no error requiring this Court's intervention, in view of the state of …

Read full judgment
Editions Progitech Inc. v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2002-01-16
Neutral citation
2002 FCA 19
File numbers
A-168-99
Decision Content
Date: 20020116
Docket: A-168-99
Montréal, Quebec, January 16, 2002
CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A.
DÉCARY J.A.
NOËL J.A.
BETWEEN:
LES EDITIONS PROGITECH INC.
Plaintiff
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF CANADA
Defendants
JUDGMENT
The application for judicial review is dismissed with costs.
Alice Desjardins
J.A.
Certified true translation
Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L. Trad. a.
Date: 20020116
Docket: A-168-99
Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 19
CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A.
DÉCARY J.A.
NOËL J.A.
BETWEEN:
LES EDITIONS PROGITECH INC.
Plaintiff
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF CANADA
Defendants
Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec on January 16, 2002.
Judgment from the bench at Montréal, Quebec on January 16, 2002.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DESJARDINS J.A.
Date: 20020116
Docket: A-168-99
Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 19
CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A.
DÉCARY J.A.
NOËL J.A.
BETWEEN:
LES EDITIONS PROGITECH INC.
Plaintiff
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF CANADA
Defendants
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec
on January 16, 2002)
DESJARDINS J.A.
[1] We consider that the trial judge (see Editions Progitech Inc. v. Canada, [1999] 99 D.T.C. 672, [1999] T.C.J. No. 92 (QL)) made no error requiring this Court's intervention, in view of the state of the record before her.
[2] The application for judicial review will be dismissed with costs.
Alice Desjardins
J.A.
Certified true translation
Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L. Trad. a.
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
APPEAL DIVISION
Date: 20020116
Docket: A-168-99
Between:
LES EDITIONS PROGITECH INC.
Plaintiff
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF CANADA
Defendants
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
OF THE COURT
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
APPEAL DIVISION
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
FILE: A-168-99
CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A.
DÉCARY J.A.
NOËL J.A.
STYLE OF CAUSE: LES EDITIONS PROGITECH INC.
Plaintiff
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF CANADA
Defendants
PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec
DATE OF HEARING: January 16, 2002
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DESJARDINS J.A.
DATED: January 16, 2002
APPEARANCES:
Jean-Philippe Desmarais FOR THE PLAINTIFF
Valérie Tardif FOR THE DEFENDANTS
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Grey, Casgrain FOR THE PLAINTIFF
Montréal, Quebec
Morris A. Rosenberg FOR THE DEFENDANTS
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Montréal, Quebec

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases