Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2008

Brizzi v. Canada

2008 FCA 200
CriminalJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Brizzi v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2008-06-05 Neutral citation 2008 FCA 200 File numbers A-294-07 Decision Content Date: 20080605 Docket: A-294-07 Citation: 2008 FCA 200 CORAM: LÉTOURNEAU J.A. NOËL J.A. TRUDEL J.A. BETWEEN: NICOLA BRIZZI Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Heard at Montréal, Quebec, on June 5, 2008. Judgment delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on June 5, 2008. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: LÉTOURNEAU J.A. Date: 20080605 Docket: A-294-07 Citation: 2008 FCA 200 CORAM: LÉTOURNEAU J.A. NOËL J.A. TRUDEL J.A. BETWEEN: NICOLA BRIZZI Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on June 5, 2008) LÉTOURNEAU J.A. [1] We would dismiss this appeal. The argument made by the appellant’s counsel was not made anywhere, be it before the Tax Court of Canada or in the memorandum of fact and law before this Court. [2] In any event, what the appellant’s counsel is asking us to do is to bring the Income Tax Act in line with the provisions of the Criminal Code with regard to the forfeiture of property constituting the proceeds of crime in order to retroactively zero-rate forfeited property as of when it was forfeited. [3] The application clearly requires legislative amendments, and the discretion to bring the statutes in question in line with one another, as requested by the appellant, belongs to Parliament. [4] The appeal will be di…

Read full judgment
Brizzi v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2008-06-05
Neutral citation
2008 FCA 200
File numbers
A-294-07
Decision Content
Date: 20080605
Docket: A-294-07
Citation: 2008 FCA 200
CORAM: LÉTOURNEAU J.A.
NOËL J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
BETWEEN:
NICOLA BRIZZI
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
Heard at Montréal, Quebec, on June 5, 2008.
Judgment delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on June 5, 2008.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: LÉTOURNEAU J.A.
Date: 20080605
Docket: A-294-07
Citation: 2008 FCA 200
CORAM: LÉTOURNEAU J.A.
NOËL J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
BETWEEN:
NICOLA BRIZZI
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on June 5, 2008)
LÉTOURNEAU J.A.
[1] We would dismiss this appeal. The argument made by the appellant’s counsel was not made anywhere, be it before the Tax Court of Canada or in the memorandum of fact and law before this Court.
[2] In any event, what the appellant’s counsel is asking us to do is to bring the Income Tax Act in line with the provisions of the Criminal Code with regard to the forfeiture of property constituting the proceeds of crime in order to retroactively zero-rate forfeited property as of when it was forfeited.
[3] The application clearly requires legislative amendments, and the discretion to bring the statutes in question in line with one another, as requested by the appellant, belongs to Parliament.
[4] The appeal will be dismissed with costs.
“Gilles Létourneau”
J.A.
Certified true translation
Johanna Kratz
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-294-07
STYLE OF CAUSE: Nicola Brizzi v. Her Majesty the Queen
PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec
DATE OF HEARING: June 5, 2008
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: LÉTOURNEAU J.A.
NOËL J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: LÉTOURNEAU J.A.
APPEARANCES:
Roger Pilon
FOR THE APPELLANT
Annick Provencher
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Roger Pilon
Laval, Quebec
FOR THE APPELLANT
John H. Sims, Q.C.
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
FOR THE RESPONDENT

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases