Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2004

Canada (Attorney General) v. Worden

2004 FCA 83
AdministrativeJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Canada (Attorney General) v. Worden Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2004-03-01 Neutral citation 2004 FCA 83 File numbers A-215-03 Decision Content Date: 20040301 Docket: A-215-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 83 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. PELLETIER J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant and JEFFREY WORDEN Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on March 1, 2004. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on March 1, 2004. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A. Date: 20040301 Docket: A-215-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 83 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. PELLETIER J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant and JEFFREY WORDEN Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on March 1, 2004) ROTHSTEIN J.A. [1] Notwithstanding counsel's argument, we have not been persuaded that the Umpire's decision was unreasonable when she found that the findings of fact made by the Board of Referees were reasonably open to it and dismissed the appeal on that basis. [2] This application for judicial review will be dismissed with costs as agreed of $8,500 inclusive of fees, disbursements and GST. "Marshall Rothstein" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-215-03 STYLE OF CAUSE: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant and JEFFREY WORDEN Respondent PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: MARCH 1, 2004 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT…

Read full judgment
Canada (Attorney General) v. Worden
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2004-03-01
Neutral citation
2004 FCA 83
File numbers
A-215-03
Decision Content
Date: 20040301
Docket: A-215-03
Citation: 2004 FCA 83
CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
MALONE J.A.
BETWEEN:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Applicant
and
JEFFREY WORDEN
Respondent
Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on March 1, 2004.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on March 1, 2004.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
Date: 20040301
Docket: A-215-03
Citation: 2004 FCA 83
CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
MALONE J.A.
BETWEEN:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Applicant
and
JEFFREY WORDEN
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on March 1, 2004)
ROTHSTEIN J.A.
[1] Notwithstanding counsel's argument, we have not been persuaded that the Umpire's decision was unreasonable when she found that the findings of fact made by the Board of Referees were reasonably open to it and dismissed the appeal on that basis.
[2] This application for judicial review will be dismissed with costs as agreed of $8,500 inclusive of fees, disbursements and GST.
"Marshall Rothstein"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-215-03
STYLE OF CAUSE: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Applicant
and
JEFFREY WORDEN
Respondent
PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO
DATE OF HEARING: MARCH 1, 2004
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
OF THE COURT: (ROTHSTEIN, PELLETIER & MALONE JJ.A)
DELIVERED FROM THE
BENCH BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
APPEARANCES:
Mr. Derek Edwards
FOR THE APPLICANT
Mr. Howard Goldblatt
Ms. Tamar Witelson
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Morris Rosenberg
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Toronto, Ontario
FOR THE APPLICANT
Sack Goldblatt Mitchell
Toronto, Ontario
FOR THE RESPONDENT

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases