Arseneault v. Canada (Attorney General)
Source text
Arseneault v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2006-07-28 Neutral citation 2006 FCA 267 File numbers A-66-05, A-67-05, A-68-05, A-69-05, A-70-05, A-72-05, A-73-05, A-74-05 Decision Content Date: 20060728 Dockets: A-66-05 A-67-05 A-68-05 A-69-05 A-70-05 A-72-05 A-73-05 A-74-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 267 Between: Docket: A-66-05 YVES ARSENEAULT Applicant AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Docket: A-67-05 FRANCINE ARSENEAULT Applicant AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Docket: A-68-05 FRANCINE ARSENEAULT Applicant AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Docket: A-69-05 FRANCINE ARSENEAULT Applicant AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Docket: A-70-05 YVES ARSENEAULT Applicant AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Docket: A-72-05 YVES ARSENEAULT Applicant AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Docket: A-73-05 LOUIS ARSENEAULT Applicant AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Docket: A-74-05 LOUIS ARSENEAULT Applicant AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS – REASONS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is the assessment of the costs to be paid to the respondent following the decision dated January 10, 2006 dismissing the applications for judicial review filed by the applicants, with one set of costs and disbursements in each case. [2] As requested, the assessment was done without the personal appearance of the parties. Up to now, we have not rec…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Arseneault v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2006-07-28 Neutral citation 2006 FCA 267 File numbers A-66-05, A-67-05, A-68-05, A-69-05, A-70-05, A-72-05, A-73-05, A-74-05 Decision Content Date: 20060728 Dockets: A-66-05 A-67-05 A-68-05 A-69-05 A-70-05 A-72-05 A-73-05 A-74-05 Citation: 2006 FCA 267 Between: Docket: A-66-05 YVES ARSENEAULT Applicant AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Docket: A-67-05 FRANCINE ARSENEAULT Applicant AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Docket: A-68-05 FRANCINE ARSENEAULT Applicant AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Docket: A-69-05 FRANCINE ARSENEAULT Applicant AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Docket: A-70-05 YVES ARSENEAULT Applicant AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Docket: A-72-05 YVES ARSENEAULT Applicant AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Docket: A-73-05 LOUIS ARSENEAULT Applicant AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Docket: A-74-05 LOUIS ARSENEAULT Applicant AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS – REASONS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is the assessment of the costs to be paid to the respondent following the decision dated January 10, 2006 dismissing the applications for judicial review filed by the applicants, with one set of costs and disbursements in each case. [2] As requested, the assessment was done without the personal appearance of the parties. Up to now, we have not received any answer to our letter dated May 2, 2006 establishing a timetable for the filing of written submissions. [3] In the circumstances, the respondent’s fees are allowed in an amount of $2,418 for the following items of Tariff B: 2 (7 units), 13 (5 units), 14 (3 units X 2h03min) and 26 (2 units). I reduced the number of units to 2 for the assessment because it was not contested. As far as the disbursements incurred in these cases are concerned, the evidence of which was established by affidavit, they are allowed for an amount of $647.92. [4] In conclusion, the respondent’s costs are assessed at $3,065.92. A certificate is issued for this amount in A‑66‑05, and a copy of these reasons is filed in the following dockets: A‑67‑05, A‑68‑05, A‑69‑05, A‑70‑05, A‑72‑05, A‑73‑05 and A-74-05. DATED AT MONTRÉAL, THIS 28TH DAY OF JULY 2006 Signed: “Michelle Lamy” MICHELLE LAMY ASSESSMENT OFFICER Certified true translation Michael Palles FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL SOLICITORS OF RECORD COURT DOCKET NUMBER: A-66-05 ET AL. Between: YVES ARSENEAULT Applicant AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN WRITING PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec REASONS BY MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER DATED: JULY 28, 2006 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Ouellet Nadon & Associés Montréal, Quebec For the applicant John Sims Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario For the respondent
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Klouvi c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 80