Aguebor v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
Source text
Aguebor v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2006-01-23 Neutral citation 2006 FC 64 File numbers IMM-267-06 Decision Content Date: 20060123 Docket: IMM-267-06 Citation: 2006 FC 64 BETWEEN: OSADOLOR AGUEBOR Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER STRAYER D.J. [1] I have concluded that the applicant has not demonstrated a serious issue to be considered in his application for leave and for judicial review. Nor has he proven the probability of irreparable harm should he be returned to Nigeria. On the balance of convenience I would also refuse this stay. [2] I have considered new arguments, raised orally, by counsel for the applicant at this hearing, as to whether the PRRA officer should have held an oral hearing because of concerns about the applicant's credibility. No such hearing was requested by the applicant. In reviewing the officer's decision it appears to me that his concerns were not with the applicant's credibility, but with the adequacy of the documentary evidence submitted by him in support of his belief that he would be persecuted as a witch if he returns to Nigeria. [3] The application for a stay of removal will therefore be dismissed. "B. L. Strayer" D.J. Toronto, Ontario January 23, 2006 FEDERAL COURT NAME OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-267-06 STYLE OF CAUSE: OSADOLOR AGUEBOR Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respond…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Aguebor v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2006-01-23 Neutral citation 2006 FC 64 File numbers IMM-267-06 Decision Content Date: 20060123 Docket: IMM-267-06 Citation: 2006 FC 64 BETWEEN: OSADOLOR AGUEBOR Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER STRAYER D.J. [1] I have concluded that the applicant has not demonstrated a serious issue to be considered in his application for leave and for judicial review. Nor has he proven the probability of irreparable harm should he be returned to Nigeria. On the balance of convenience I would also refuse this stay. [2] I have considered new arguments, raised orally, by counsel for the applicant at this hearing, as to whether the PRRA officer should have held an oral hearing because of concerns about the applicant's credibility. No such hearing was requested by the applicant. In reviewing the officer's decision it appears to me that his concerns were not with the applicant's credibility, but with the adequacy of the documentary evidence submitted by him in support of his belief that he would be persecuted as a witch if he returns to Nigeria. [3] The application for a stay of removal will therefore be dismissed. "B. L. Strayer" D.J. Toronto, Ontario January 23, 2006 FEDERAL COURT NAME OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-267-06 STYLE OF CAUSE: OSADOLOR AGUEBOR Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: JANUARY 23, 2006 REASONS FOR ORDER: STRAYER J. DATED: JANUARY 23, 2006 APPEARANCES: Kingsley Jesuorobo Barrister and Solicitor FOR THE APPLICANT Vanita Goela Department of Justice For the Respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Kingsley Jesuorobo Barrister and Soilcitor FOR THE APPLICANT John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
Klouvi c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 80