Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2004

Canada (Attorney General) v. Leung

2004 FCA 160
AdministrativeJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Canada (Attorney General) v. Leung Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2004-04-01 Neutral citation 2004 FCA 160 File numbers A-328-03 Decision Content Date: 20040401 Docket: A-328-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 160 CORAM: STRAYER J.A. NOËL J.A. SEXTON J.A. BETWEEN: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant and THOMAS LEUNG Respondent Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia on April 1, 2004. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia on April 1, 2004. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: SEXTON J.A. Date: 20040401 Docket: A-328-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 160 CORAM: STRAYER J.A. NOËL J.A. SEXTON J.A. BETWEEN: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant and THOMAS LEUNG Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia on April 1, 2004) SEXTON J.A. [1] We are unable to conclude that the decision of the Umpire was palpably wrong in the result. He concluded, as apparently did the minority of the Board of Referees, that Mr. Leung had every reason to expect that his employment with Integrated Cable Systems Inc. would continue and therefore had just cause for leaving the employment with Shanghai Chinese Bistro. [2] The application will be dismissed. (Sgd.) "J. Edgar Sexton" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-328-03 Application for Judicial Review of a decision by the Umpire dated May 14, 2003 STYLE OF CAUSE: The Attorney General of Canada v. Thomas Leung PLACE OF …

Read full judgment
Canada (Attorney General) v. Leung
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2004-04-01
Neutral citation
2004 FCA 160
File numbers
A-328-03
Decision Content
Date: 20040401
Docket: A-328-03
Citation: 2004 FCA 160
CORAM: STRAYER J.A.
NOËL J.A.
SEXTON J.A.
BETWEEN:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Applicant
and
THOMAS LEUNG
Respondent
Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia on April 1, 2004.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia on April 1, 2004.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: SEXTON J.A.
Date: 20040401
Docket: A-328-03
Citation: 2004 FCA 160
CORAM: STRAYER J.A.
NOËL J.A.
SEXTON J.A.
BETWEEN:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Applicant
and
THOMAS LEUNG
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia on April 1, 2004)
SEXTON J.A.
[1] We are unable to conclude that the decision of the Umpire was palpably wrong in the result. He concluded, as apparently did the minority of the Board of Referees, that Mr. Leung had every reason to expect that his employment with Integrated Cable Systems Inc. would continue and therefore had just cause for leaving the employment with Shanghai Chinese Bistro.
[2] The application will be dismissed.
(Sgd.) "J. Edgar Sexton"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-328-03
Application for Judicial Review of a decision by the Umpire dated May 14, 2003
STYLE OF CAUSE: The Attorney General of Canada v. Thomas Leung
PLACE OF HEARING: Vancouver, BC
DATE OF HEARING: April 1, 2004
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: Strayer, JA Noël, JA Sexton, JA
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: Sexton, JA
APPEARANCES:
Mr. Edward Burnet
Department of Justice
FOR THE
APPLICANT
No one appearing
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Mr. Morris Rosenberg
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
FOR THE
APPLICANT

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases