Tanaka v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
Source text
Tanaka v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2023-04-05 Neutral citation 2023 FC 486 File numbers IMM-1367-22 Decision Content Date: 20230405 Docket: IMM-1367-22 Citation: 2023 FC 486 Toronto, Ontario, April 5, 2023 PRESENT: The Honourable Madam Justice Heneghan BETWEEN: YUKI TANAKA Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS AND JUDGMENT [1]Ms. Yuki Tanaka (the “Applicant”) seeks judicial review of the decision of an Immigration Officer, refusing her application for a Family Violence Temporary Resident Permit as permitted by section 24 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27. [2]The Applicant raises issues of procedural fairness, largely based upon deficiencies in the Certified Tribunal Record (the “CTR”), and the overall reasonableness of the decision. [3]Issues of procedural fairness are reviewable upon the standard of correctness; see the decision in Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Khosa, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 339 (S.C.C.). The merits of the decision are reviewable upon the standard of reasonableness; see the decision in Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, [2019] 4 S.C.R. 653 (S.C.C.). [4]I am satisfied that the deficiencies in the CTR amount to a breach of procedural fairness, following the decision in Parveen v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (1999), 168 F.T.R. 103. This is a sufficient basis upon which to al…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Tanaka v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2023-04-05 Neutral citation 2023 FC 486 File numbers IMM-1367-22 Decision Content Date: 20230405 Docket: IMM-1367-22 Citation: 2023 FC 486 Toronto, Ontario, April 5, 2023 PRESENT: The Honourable Madam Justice Heneghan BETWEEN: YUKI TANAKA Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS AND JUDGMENT [1]Ms. Yuki Tanaka (the “Applicant”) seeks judicial review of the decision of an Immigration Officer, refusing her application for a Family Violence Temporary Resident Permit as permitted by section 24 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27. [2]The Applicant raises issues of procedural fairness, largely based upon deficiencies in the Certified Tribunal Record (the “CTR”), and the overall reasonableness of the decision. [3]Issues of procedural fairness are reviewable upon the standard of correctness; see the decision in Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Khosa, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 339 (S.C.C.). The merits of the decision are reviewable upon the standard of reasonableness; see the decision in Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, [2019] 4 S.C.R. 653 (S.C.C.). [4]I am satisfied that the deficiencies in the CTR amount to a breach of procedural fairness, following the decision in Parveen v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (1999), 168 F.T.R. 103. This is a sufficient basis upon which to allow this application for judicial review and it is unnecessary for me to address the other arguments raised by the Applicant. JUDGMENT in IMM-1367-22 THIS COURT’S JUDGMENT is that the application for judicial review is allowed, the decision of the Immigration Officer is set aside and the matter is remitted to another Immigration Officer for redetermination. There is no question for certification. “E. Heneghan” Judge FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-1367-22 STYLE OF CAUSE: YUKI TANAKA v. THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: APRIL 5, 2023 REASONS AND JUDGMENT: HENEGHAN J. DATED: April 5, 2023 APPEARANCES: Mario Bellissimo FOR THE APPLICANT Ian Hicks FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Bellissimo Law Group PC Toronto, Ontario FOR THE APPLICANT Attorney General of Canada Toronto, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
Klouvi c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 80