Canada (Attorney General) v. Edmison
Court headnote
Canada (Attorney General) v. Edmison Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2008-01-23 Neutral citation 2008 FCA 28 File numbers A-132-07 Decision Content Date: 20080123 Docket: A-132-07 Citation: 2008 FCA 28 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. NADON J.A. TRUDEL J.A. BETWEEN: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant and JENNIFER LYNNE EDMISON Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on January 23, 2008. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on January 23, 2008. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A. Date: 20080123 Docket: A-132-07 Citation: 2008 FCA 28 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. NADON J.A. TRUDEL J.A. BETWEEN: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant and JENNIFER LYNNE EDMISON Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on January 23, 2008) [1] This is a borderline case. On the particulars facts of the case, we cannot conclude, on a standard of reasonableness, that the Umpire erred in refusing to interfere with the decision of the Board of Referees which found that the respondent had shown good cause for delaying her application for benefits. [2] Accordingly, the Attorney General’s judicial review application will be dismissed with costs. “M. Nadon” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-132-07 (AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE HON. MR. JUSTICE HADDAD, AS UMPIRE, DATED JANUARY 16, 2007. EMPLYOMENT INSURANCE. FILE: CUB 67658) STYLE OF CAUSE: THE AT…
Read full judgment
Canada (Attorney General) v. Edmison Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2008-01-23 Neutral citation 2008 FCA 28 File numbers A-132-07 Decision Content Date: 20080123 Docket: A-132-07 Citation: 2008 FCA 28 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. NADON J.A. TRUDEL J.A. BETWEEN: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant and JENNIFER LYNNE EDMISON Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on January 23, 2008. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on January 23, 2008. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A. Date: 20080123 Docket: A-132-07 Citation: 2008 FCA 28 CORAM: DÉCARY J.A. NADON J.A. TRUDEL J.A. BETWEEN: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant and JENNIFER LYNNE EDMISON Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on January 23, 2008) [1] This is a borderline case. On the particulars facts of the case, we cannot conclude, on a standard of reasonableness, that the Umpire erred in refusing to interfere with the decision of the Board of Referees which found that the respondent had shown good cause for delaying her application for benefits. [2] Accordingly, the Attorney General’s judicial review application will be dismissed with costs. “M. Nadon” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-132-07 (AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE HON. MR. JUSTICE HADDAD, AS UMPIRE, DATED JANUARY 16, 2007. EMPLYOMENT INSURANCE. FILE: CUB 67658) STYLE OF CAUSE: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant and JENNIFER LYNNE EDMISON Respondent PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: JANUARY 23, 2008 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: (DÉCARY, NADON, TRUDEL J.J.A.) DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: NADON J.A. APPEARANCES: Adam Rambert FOR THE APPELLANT/ APPLICANT Annie M.K. Finn FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada Toronto, Ontario FOR THE APPELLANT/ APPLICANT Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP Barristers and Solicitors Toronto, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca