Chityal v. Canada (Attorney General)
Court headnote
Chityal v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2002-02-06 Neutral citation 2002 FCT 138 File numbers T-1029-00 Decision Content Date: 20020206 Docket: T-1029-00 Neutral Citation: 2002 FCT 138 Between: DAVID CHITYAL Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This application for judicial review was dismissed on July 5, 2001, with costs. As a result of that judgment, the respondent filed his bill of costs on December 3, 2001, and asked that it be assessed without the personal appearance of the parties. As of this date, Alain Aubin has not filed any representations on behalf of the applicant. [2] Having regard to the foregoing, the respondent's bill is assessed as submitted. The amount of $1,103.67 is allowed for the fees claimed under items 2 (4 units), 13 (2 units), 14 (2 units X 31 minutes) and 26 (3 units) as well as the disbursements totalling $22.50. [3] An assessment certificate in the amount of $1,126.17 is issued in this case. MICHELLE LAMY ASSESSMENT OFFICER MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC February 6, 2002 Certified true translation S. Debbané, LLB FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION Date: 20020206 Docket: T-1029-00 BETWEEN: DAVID CHITYAL Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD COURT FILE NO.: T-1029-00 Between: DAVID CHITYAL Applicant AND ATTORNEY GENERAL …
Read full judgment
Chityal v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2002-02-06 Neutral citation 2002 FCT 138 File numbers T-1029-00 Decision Content Date: 20020206 Docket: T-1029-00 Neutral Citation: 2002 FCT 138 Between: DAVID CHITYAL Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This application for judicial review was dismissed on July 5, 2001, with costs. As a result of that judgment, the respondent filed his bill of costs on December 3, 2001, and asked that it be assessed without the personal appearance of the parties. As of this date, Alain Aubin has not filed any representations on behalf of the applicant. [2] Having regard to the foregoing, the respondent's bill is assessed as submitted. The amount of $1,103.67 is allowed for the fees claimed under items 2 (4 units), 13 (2 units), 14 (2 units X 31 minutes) and 26 (3 units) as well as the disbursements totalling $22.50. [3] An assessment certificate in the amount of $1,126.17 is issued in this case. MICHELLE LAMY ASSESSMENT OFFICER MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC February 6, 2002 Certified true translation S. Debbané, LLB FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION Date: 20020206 Docket: T-1029-00 BETWEEN: DAVID CHITYAL Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD COURT FILE NO.: T-1029-00 Between: DAVID CHITYAL Applicant AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal, Quebec REASONS OF MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER DATE OF REASONS: February 6, 2002 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Michel Aubin Montréal, Quebec For the Applicant Morris Rosenberg Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario For the Respondent
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca