Shah c. Canada (Ministre de la citoyenneté et de l'immigration)
Source text
Shah c. Canada (Ministre de la citoyenneté et de l'immigration) Base de données – Cour (s) Décisions de la Cour fédérale Date 2002-03-25 Référence neutre 2002 CFPI 333 Numéro de dossier IMM-830-02 Contenu de la décision Date: 20020325 Docket: IMM-830-02 Neutral citation: 2002 FCT 333 OTTAWA, ONTARIO, this 25th day of March, 2002 Present: The Honourable Mr. Justice Beaudry BETWEEN: SEYYID MOHAMMAD AQEEL SHAH Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [1] This is a motion pursuant to Rule 369 for an extension of time to file an Application for Judicial Review beyond the 30 day limit prescribed in Section 18.(2) of the Federal Court Act. [2] The applicant did not file an affidavit explaining why he did not file an application for judicial review in the prescribed time period. [3] I am satisfied that there is no arguable case here. Grewal v. M.E.I., [1985] 2 F.C. 263. ORDER THIS COURT ORDERS that the application for an extension of time is dismissed. "Michel Beaudry" Judge…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Shah c. Canada (Ministre de la citoyenneté et de l'immigration) Base de données – Cour (s) Décisions de la Cour fédérale Date 2002-03-25 Référence neutre 2002 CFPI 333 Numéro de dossier IMM-830-02 Contenu de la décision Date: 20020325 Docket: IMM-830-02 Neutral citation: 2002 FCT 333 OTTAWA, ONTARIO, this 25th day of March, 2002 Present: The Honourable Mr. Justice Beaudry BETWEEN: SEYYID MOHAMMAD AQEEL SHAH Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [1] This is a motion pursuant to Rule 369 for an extension of time to file an Application for Judicial Review beyond the 30 day limit prescribed in Section 18.(2) of the Federal Court Act. [2] The applicant did not file an affidavit explaining why he did not file an application for judicial review in the prescribed time period. [3] I am satisfied that there is no arguable case here. Grewal v. M.E.I., [1985] 2 F.C. 263. ORDER THIS COURT ORDERS that the application for an extension of time is dismissed. "Michel Beaudry" Judge
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
Klouvi c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 80