Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2010Unreviewed source text

Sychuk v. Canada (Attorney General)

2010 FCA 7
AdministrativeJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing unreviewed source text. Provenance under review — verify against the linked original before relying on it.

Source text

Sychuk v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2010-01-11 Neutral citation 2010 FCA 7 File numbers A-106-09 Decision Content Date: 20100111 Docket: A-106-09 Citation: 2010 FCA 7 CORAM: BLAIS C.J. SHARLOW J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: MAURICE J. SYCHUK Appellant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Calgary, Alberta, on January 11, 2010. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Calgary, Alberta, on January 11, 2010. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: SHARLOW J.A. Date: 20100111 Docket: A-106-09 Citation: 2010 FCA 7 CORAM: BLAIS C.J. SHARLOW J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: MAURICE J. SYCHUK Appellant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Calgary, Alberta, on January 11, 2010) SHARLOW J.A. [1] Mr. Sychuk, a parolee, has asked the National Parole Board to remove form his parole conditions the requirement that he remain in Canada at all times. The National Parole Board refused his request, and its decision was affirmed on appeal. Mr. Sychuk applied for judicial review. Justice Lemieux dismissed the application. Mr. Sychuk now appeals to this Court. [2] We have not been persuaded that Justice Lemieux, in dismissing Mr. Sychuk’s application for judicial review, made any error of law or any other error warranting the intervention of this Court. We agree with Justice Lemieux’s decision, substantially for the reasons he gave. The appeal will be dismissed with costs.…

Read full judgment (source text)

Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.

Sychuk v. Canada (Attorney General)
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2010-01-11
Neutral citation
2010 FCA 7
File numbers
A-106-09
Decision Content
Date: 20100111
Docket: A-106-09
Citation: 2010 FCA 7
CORAM: BLAIS C.J.
SHARLOW J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
BETWEEN:
MAURICE J. SYCHUK
Appellant
and
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
Heard at Calgary, Alberta, on January 11, 2010.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Calgary, Alberta, on January 11, 2010.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: SHARLOW J.A.
Date: 20100111
Docket: A-106-09
Citation: 2010 FCA 7
CORAM: BLAIS C.J.
SHARLOW J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
BETWEEN:
MAURICE J. SYCHUK
Appellant
and
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Calgary, Alberta, on January 11, 2010)
SHARLOW J.A.
[1] Mr. Sychuk, a parolee, has asked the National Parole Board to remove form his parole conditions the requirement that he remain in Canada at all times. The National Parole Board refused his request, and its decision was affirmed on appeal. Mr. Sychuk applied for judicial review. Justice Lemieux dismissed the application. Mr. Sychuk now appeals to this Court.
[2] We have not been persuaded that Justice Lemieux, in dismissing Mr. Sychuk’s application for judicial review, made any error of law or any other error warranting the intervention of this Court. We agree with Justice Lemieux’s decision, substantially for the reasons he gave. The appeal will be dismissed with costs.
“K. Sharlow”
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-106-09
(AN APPEAL FROM THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LEMIEUX, OF THE FEDERAL COURT, DATED JANUARY 30, 2009, FROM THE FEDERAL COURT FILE T-281-08).
STYLE OF CAUSE: MAURICE J. SYCHUK v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
PLACE OF HEARING: CALGARY, ALBERTA
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF
THE COURT BY: BLAIS C.J., SHARLOW, PELLETIER JJ.A.
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: SHARLOW J.A.
APPEARANCES:
Self Represented FOR THE APPELLANT
Kerry E. S. Boyd FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
N/A FOR THE APPELLANT
John H. Sims, Q.C. FOR THE RESPONDENT
Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases