Skip to main content
Federal Court· 2001

Xiao v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)

2001 FCT 202
AdministrativeJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Xiao v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2001-03-20 Neutral citation 2001 FCT 202 File numbers IMM-953-00 Decision Content Date: 20010320 Docket: IMM-953-00 Neutral Citation: 2001 FCT 202 Between: MEI FENG XIAO Applicant, - and - THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION, Respondent. SUPPLEMENTARY REASONS FOR ORDER AND SUPPLEMENTARY ORDER Muldoon, J. These reasons and order are supplementary to those issued on March 16, 201. This Court declines to certify that a serious question of general importance is involved in this matter. Ottawa, Ontario March 20, 2001 Judge SUPPLEMENTARY ORDER UPON dismissing the applicant's application for judicial review of the CRDD panel's February 9, 2000, determination that the applicant is not a Convention Refugee (file V99-03527), now THIS COURT refuses to certify any question, all pursuant to subsection 83.(4) of the Immigration Act. Judge …

Read full judgment
Xiao v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
Court (s) Database
Federal Court Decisions
Date
2001-03-20
Neutral citation
2001 FCT 202
File numbers
IMM-953-00
Decision Content
Date: 20010320
Docket: IMM-953-00
Neutral Citation: 2001 FCT 202
Between:
MEI FENG XIAO
Applicant,
- and -
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP
AND IMMIGRATION,
Respondent.
SUPPLEMENTARY REASONS FOR ORDER
AND SUPPLEMENTARY ORDER
Muldoon, J.
These reasons and order are supplementary to those issued on March 16, 201. This Court declines to certify that a serious question of general importance is involved in this matter.
Ottawa, Ontario
March 20, 2001
Judge
SUPPLEMENTARY ORDER
UPON dismissing the applicant's application for judicial review of the CRDD panel's February 9, 2000, determination that the applicant is not a Convention Refugee (file V99-03527), now
THIS COURT refuses to certify any question, all pursuant to subsection 83.(4) of the Immigration Act.
Judge

Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca

Related cases