Laforme V. Mississaugas
Court headnote
Laforme V. Mississaugas Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2001-09-28 Neutral citation 2001 FCA 287 File numbers A-455-96 Decision Content Date: 20010928 Docket: A-455-96 Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 287 BETWEEN: MARVIN LAFORME Appellant - and - BAND COUNCIL OF THE MISSISSAUGAS OF THE NEW CREDIT FIRST UNION Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS R. BEZUHLY ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] On May 11, 2000, the Federal Court of Appeal allowed the appeal with costs. The Appellant filed a bill of costs in writing without personal appearance. Directions were issued to both parties setting a timetable for serving and filing of materials, including written submissions. The Respondent, did not file any submissions in response. [2] In absence of a response from the Respondent, I examined the items claimed in the bill of costs to ensure that they were within the parameters of the Federal Court Rules and Tariff B. As per Tariff B, I have used the unit value of 110 effective April 1, 2001, not a unit value of 200 as specified in Appellant's Bill of Costs. Therefore, I allow the Appellant's Bill of Costs, presented at $4,662.90, at $2,952.90. R. Bezuhly Assessment Officer Toronto, Ontario September 28, 2001 FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA Date: 20010928 Docket: A-455-96 BETWEEN: MARVIN LAFORME Appellant - and - BAND COUNCIL OF THE MISSISSAUGAS OF THE NEW CREDIT FIRST NATION Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS …
Read full judgment
Laforme V. Mississaugas Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2001-09-28 Neutral citation 2001 FCA 287 File numbers A-455-96 Decision Content Date: 20010928 Docket: A-455-96 Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 287 BETWEEN: MARVIN LAFORME Appellant - and - BAND COUNCIL OF THE MISSISSAUGAS OF THE NEW CREDIT FIRST UNION Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS R. BEZUHLY ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] On May 11, 2000, the Federal Court of Appeal allowed the appeal with costs. The Appellant filed a bill of costs in writing without personal appearance. Directions were issued to both parties setting a timetable for serving and filing of materials, including written submissions. The Respondent, did not file any submissions in response. [2] In absence of a response from the Respondent, I examined the items claimed in the bill of costs to ensure that they were within the parameters of the Federal Court Rules and Tariff B. As per Tariff B, I have used the unit value of 110 effective April 1, 2001, not a unit value of 200 as specified in Appellant's Bill of Costs. Therefore, I allow the Appellant's Bill of Costs, presented at $4,662.90, at $2,952.90. R. Bezuhly Assessment Officer Toronto, Ontario September 28, 2001 FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA Date: 20010928 Docket: A-455-96 BETWEEN: MARVIN LAFORME Appellant - and - BAND COUNCIL OF THE MISSISSAUGAS OF THE NEW CREDIT FIRST NATION Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca