R. v. Clermont
Court headnote
R. v. Clermont Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1988-10-07 Report [1988] 2 SCR 171 Case number 20165 Judges McIntyre, William Rogers; Wilson, Bertha; La Forest, Gérard V.; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Sopinka, John On appeal from Quebec Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 20165 Decision Content r. v. clermont, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 171 Her Majesty The Queen Appellant v. Sylvain Clermont Respondent indexed as: r. v. clermont File No.: 20165. 1988: October 7. Present: McIntyre, Wilson, La Forest, L'Heureux‑Dubé and Sopinka JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for quebec Criminal law ‑‑ Sentence ‑‑ Probation ‑‑ Accused bound by probation order convicted of an offence ‑‑ Revocation of probation order and imposition of consecutive sentence ‑‑ Whether s. 664(4)(d) of the Criminal Code allows the court to impose a consecutive sentence when a probation order is revoked. APPEAL from a judgment of the Quebec Court of Appeal (1986), 5 Q.A.C. 261, 30 C.C.C. (3d) 571, allowing an appeal by the accused from the sentences imposed at trial. Appeal dismissed. Ginette Kirouac, for the appellant. Andrée Marier, for the respondent. English version of the judgment of the Court delivered orally by 1. McIntyre J.‑‑We will not be calling upon you, Mrs. Marier. We are all of the view that the appeal should be dismissed for the reasons given by Rothman J.A. The appeal is dismissed. Appeal dismissed. Solicitor for the appellant: Ginette Kirouac, Ste‑Foy. Solicitors for the respondent: Ouell…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
R. v. Clermont Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1988-10-07 Report [1988] 2 SCR 171 Case number 20165 Judges McIntyre, William Rogers; Wilson, Bertha; La Forest, Gérard V.; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Sopinka, John On appeal from Quebec Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 20165 Decision Content r. v. clermont, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 171 Her Majesty The Queen Appellant v. Sylvain Clermont Respondent indexed as: r. v. clermont File No.: 20165. 1988: October 7. Present: McIntyre, Wilson, La Forest, L'Heureux‑Dubé and Sopinka JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for quebec Criminal law ‑‑ Sentence ‑‑ Probation ‑‑ Accused bound by probation order convicted of an offence ‑‑ Revocation of probation order and imposition of consecutive sentence ‑‑ Whether s. 664(4)(d) of the Criminal Code allows the court to impose a consecutive sentence when a probation order is revoked. APPEAL from a judgment of the Quebec Court of Appeal (1986), 5 Q.A.C. 261, 30 C.C.C. (3d) 571, allowing an appeal by the accused from the sentences imposed at trial. Appeal dismissed. Ginette Kirouac, for the appellant. Andrée Marier, for the respondent. English version of the judgment of the Court delivered orally by 1. McIntyre J.‑‑We will not be calling upon you, Mrs. Marier. We are all of the view that the appeal should be dismissed for the reasons given by Rothman J.A. The appeal is dismissed. Appeal dismissed. Solicitor for the appellant: Ginette Kirouac, Ste‑Foy. Solicitors for the respondent: Ouellette & Mannella, Montréal.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca
R v Brown
[2022] 1 SCR 506