Oleinik v. Canada (Privacy Commissioner)
Source text
Oleinik v. Canada (Privacy Commissioner) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2012-09-04 Neutral citation 2012 FCA 229 File numbers A-451-11 Decision Content Date: 20120904 Docket: A-451-11 Citation: 2012 FCA 229 CORAM: BLAIS C.J. NADON J.A. GAUTHIER J.A. BETWEEN: ANTON OLEINIK Appellant and THE PRIVACY COMMISSIONER OF CANADA Respondent Heard at St. John's, Newfoundland, on September 4, 2012. Judgment delivered from the Bench at St. John's, Newfoundland, on September 4, 2012. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A. Date: 20120904 Docket: A-451-11 Citation: 2012 FCA 229 CORAM: BLAIS C.J. NADON J.A. GAUTHIER J.A. BETWEEN: ANTON OLEINIK Appellant and THE PRIVACY COMMISSIONER OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at St. John's, Newfoundland, on September 4, 2012) NADON J.A. [1] We have not been persuaded that there is any basis to interfere with Rennie J.’s decision of November 7, 2011, wherein he dismissed the Appellant’s judicial review application. [2] Accordingly, the appeal will be dismissed with costs. “M. Nadon” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-451-11 STYLE OF CAUSE: ANTON OLEINIK v. PRIVACY COMMISSIONER OF CANADA PLACE OF HEARING: St. John's, NFL DATE OF HEARING: September 4, 2012 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: Blais C.J., Nadon J.A, Gauthier J.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: Nadon J.A. APPEARANCES: Anton Oleinik THE APPELLANT ON HIS OWN BEHALF L…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Oleinik v. Canada (Privacy Commissioner) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2012-09-04 Neutral citation 2012 FCA 229 File numbers A-451-11 Decision Content Date: 20120904 Docket: A-451-11 Citation: 2012 FCA 229 CORAM: BLAIS C.J. NADON J.A. GAUTHIER J.A. BETWEEN: ANTON OLEINIK Appellant and THE PRIVACY COMMISSIONER OF CANADA Respondent Heard at St. John's, Newfoundland, on September 4, 2012. Judgment delivered from the Bench at St. John's, Newfoundland, on September 4, 2012. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A. Date: 20120904 Docket: A-451-11 Citation: 2012 FCA 229 CORAM: BLAIS C.J. NADON J.A. GAUTHIER J.A. BETWEEN: ANTON OLEINIK Appellant and THE PRIVACY COMMISSIONER OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at St. John's, Newfoundland, on September 4, 2012) NADON J.A. [1] We have not been persuaded that there is any basis to interfere with Rennie J.’s decision of November 7, 2011, wherein he dismissed the Appellant’s judicial review application. [2] Accordingly, the appeal will be dismissed with costs. “M. Nadon” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-451-11 STYLE OF CAUSE: ANTON OLEINIK v. PRIVACY COMMISSIONER OF CANADA PLACE OF HEARING: St. John's, NFL DATE OF HEARING: September 4, 2012 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: Blais C.J., Nadon J.A, Gauthier J.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: Nadon J.A. APPEARANCES: Anton Oleinik THE APPELLANT ON HIS OWN BEHALF Louisa Garib FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Legal Services Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada Ottawa, ON Nelligan O’Brien Payne LLP Ottawa, ON FOR THE RESPONDENT FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Klouvi c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 80