R. v. A.G.W.
Court headnote
R. v. A.G.W. Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 2018-02-16 Neutral citation 2018 SCC 9 Report [2018] 1 SCR 263 Case number 37795 Judges Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell On appeal from Alberta Notes SCC Case Information: 37795 Decision Content SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Citation: R. v. A.G.W., 2018 SCC 9, [2018] 1 S.C.R. 263 Appeal heard: February 16, 2018 Judgment rendered: February 16, 2018 Docket: 37795 Between: A.G.W. Appellant and Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Alberta Respondent Coram: Abella, Moldaver, Gascon, Côté and Brown JJ. Reasons for Judgment: (para. 1) Abella J. (Moldaver, Gascon, Côté and Brown JJ. concurring) R. v. A.G.W., 2018 SCC 9, [2018] 1 S.C.R. 263 A.G.W. Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Alberta Respondent Indexed as: R. v. A.G.W. 2018 SCC 9 File No.: 37795. 2018: February 16. Present: Abella, Moldaver, Gascon, Côté and Brown JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for alberta Criminal law — Appeals — Unreasonable verdict — Misapprehension of evidence — Accused convicted of sexual assault — Court of Appeal holding that trial judge properly assessed evidence and that verdict not unreasonable — Conviction upheld. APPEAL from a judgment of the Alberta Court of Appeal (Berger, Martin and Strekaf JJ.A.), 2017 ABCA 247, [2017] A.J. No. 808 (QL), 2017 CarswellAlta 1401 (WL Can.), affirming the conviction of the accused for sexual assault. Appeal dismissed. Jim Edgett, Dean Zuk and …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
R. v. A.G.W. Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 2018-02-16 Neutral citation 2018 SCC 9 Report [2018] 1 SCR 263 Case number 37795 Judges Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell On appeal from Alberta Notes SCC Case Information: 37795 Decision Content SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Citation: R. v. A.G.W., 2018 SCC 9, [2018] 1 S.C.R. 263 Appeal heard: February 16, 2018 Judgment rendered: February 16, 2018 Docket: 37795 Between: A.G.W. Appellant and Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Alberta Respondent Coram: Abella, Moldaver, Gascon, Côté and Brown JJ. Reasons for Judgment: (para. 1) Abella J. (Moldaver, Gascon, Côté and Brown JJ. concurring) R. v. A.G.W., 2018 SCC 9, [2018] 1 S.C.R. 263 A.G.W. Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Alberta Respondent Indexed as: R. v. A.G.W. 2018 SCC 9 File No.: 37795. 2018: February 16. Present: Abella, Moldaver, Gascon, Côté and Brown JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for alberta Criminal law — Appeals — Unreasonable verdict — Misapprehension of evidence — Accused convicted of sexual assault — Court of Appeal holding that trial judge properly assessed evidence and that verdict not unreasonable — Conviction upheld. APPEAL from a judgment of the Alberta Court of Appeal (Berger, Martin and Strekaf JJ.A.), 2017 ABCA 247, [2017] A.J. No. 808 (QL), 2017 CarswellAlta 1401 (WL Can.), affirming the conviction of the accused for sexual assault. Appeal dismissed. Jim Edgett, Dean Zuk and Andrew Stewart, for the appellant. Julie Morgan, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by [1] Abella J. — The appeal is dismissed for the reasons of the majority in the Court of Appeal. Judgment accordingly. Solicitors for the appellant: Zuk Stewart Edgett Criminal Barristers, Calgary. Solicitor for the respondent: Justice and Solicitor General, Appeals, Education & Prosecution Policy Branch, Calgary.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca