Penney v. Canada (Attorney General)
Source text
Penney v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2009-12-02 Neutral citation 2009 FCA 354 File numbers A-340-07 Decision Content Date: 20091202 Docket: A-340-07 Citation: 2009 FCA 354 CORAM: SHARLOW J.A. RYER J.A. TRUDEL J.A. BETWEEN: GARY PENNEY Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on December 2, 2009. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on December 2, 2009. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: RYER J.A. Date: 20091202 Docket: A-340-07 Citation: 2009 FCA 354 CORAM: SHARLOW J.A. RYER J.A. TRUDEL J.A. BETWEEN: GARY PENNEY Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on December 2, 2009) RYER J.A. [1] Despite the spirited efforts of counsel for the applicant, we are not persuaded that the Umpire, in holding the decision of the Board, made any error that warrants our intervention. Accordingly, the application will be dismissed with costs. “C. Michael Ryer” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-340-07 (APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF AN UMPIRE’S DECISION (CUB 68224) DATED APRIL 30, 2007) STYLE OF CAUSE: Gary Penney Applicant v. Attorney General of Canada Respondent PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: December 2, 2009 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: (Sharlow, Ryer, Trudel JJ.A) DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: Ryer J.A. APPEARANCE…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Penney v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2009-12-02 Neutral citation 2009 FCA 354 File numbers A-340-07 Decision Content Date: 20091202 Docket: A-340-07 Citation: 2009 FCA 354 CORAM: SHARLOW J.A. RYER J.A. TRUDEL J.A. BETWEEN: GARY PENNEY Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on December 2, 2009. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on December 2, 2009. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: RYER J.A. Date: 20091202 Docket: A-340-07 Citation: 2009 FCA 354 CORAM: SHARLOW J.A. RYER J.A. TRUDEL J.A. BETWEEN: GARY PENNEY Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on December 2, 2009) RYER J.A. [1] Despite the spirited efforts of counsel for the applicant, we are not persuaded that the Umpire, in holding the decision of the Board, made any error that warrants our intervention. Accordingly, the application will be dismissed with costs. “C. Michael Ryer” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-340-07 (APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF AN UMPIRE’S DECISION (CUB 68224) DATED APRIL 30, 2007) STYLE OF CAUSE: Gary Penney Applicant v. Attorney General of Canada Respondent PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: December 2, 2009 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: (Sharlow, Ryer, Trudel JJ.A) DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: Ryer J.A. APPEARANCES: Marc A.C. Cooper FOR THE APPLICANT Mark S. Freeman FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Marc Cooper Law Office South Dildo, NL FOR THE APPLICANT John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Klouvi c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 80