Holita v. Canada (Attorney General)
Source text
Holita v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2024-05-13 Neutral citation 2024 FC 731 File numbers T-2712-22 Decision Content Date: 20240513 Docket: T-2712-22 Citation: 2024 FC 731 Ottawa, Ontario , May 13, 2024 PRESENT: Mr. Justice Pentney BETWEEN: SUSAN HOLITA Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent CONSENT JUDGMENT UPON correspondence dated May 10, 2024 from the Respondent for a Judgment on consent of the parties granting the application for judicial review; AND UPON reading the correspondence and noting the consent of the parties by their respective solicitors; CONSIDERING that it would be in the interests of justice and economy of judicial resources to grant the relief sought; THIS COURT ORDERS that: 1. The application for judicial review is granted. 2. The ESDC’s decision accepting the investigative report arising from the Applicant’s work place harassment and violence complaint is set aside. 3. The matter is referred back to ESDC for redetermination after a new investigation is conducted by a different investigator and after the Applicant has had the opportunity to see and make submissions on evidence gathered in her absence before any report is sent to ESDC. 4. The Respondent shall pay the Applicant $3,500.00 as her all-inclusive costs. "William F. Pentney" Judge FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD Docket: T-2712-22 STYLE OF CAUSE: SUSAN HOLITA v ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA MOTION IN WRITING CONSIDERED AT OTTAWA, ONTARIO…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Holita v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2024-05-13 Neutral citation 2024 FC 731 File numbers T-2712-22 Decision Content Date: 20240513 Docket: T-2712-22 Citation: 2024 FC 731 Ottawa, Ontario , May 13, 2024 PRESENT: Mr. Justice Pentney BETWEEN: SUSAN HOLITA Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent CONSENT JUDGMENT UPON correspondence dated May 10, 2024 from the Respondent for a Judgment on consent of the parties granting the application for judicial review; AND UPON reading the correspondence and noting the consent of the parties by their respective solicitors; CONSIDERING that it would be in the interests of justice and economy of judicial resources to grant the relief sought; THIS COURT ORDERS that: 1. The application for judicial review is granted. 2. The ESDC’s decision accepting the investigative report arising from the Applicant’s work place harassment and violence complaint is set aside. 3. The matter is referred back to ESDC for redetermination after a new investigation is conducted by a different investigator and after the Applicant has had the opportunity to see and make submissions on evidence gathered in her absence before any report is sent to ESDC. 4. The Respondent shall pay the Applicant $3,500.00 as her all-inclusive costs. "William F. Pentney" Judge FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD Docket: T-2712-22 STYLE OF CAUSE: SUSAN HOLITA v ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA MOTION IN WRITING CONSIDERED AT OTTAWA, ONTARIO PURSUANT TO RULE 369 OF THE FEDERAL COURTS RULES CONSENT JUDGMENT: PENTNEY J. DATED: MAY 13, 2024 WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY: Morgan Rowe Rohoma Zakir For The Applicant Jena Montgomery For The Respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD: RAVENLAW LLP/s.r.l. Barristers and Solicitors Ottawa, Ontario FOR THE APPLICANT Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario For The Respondent
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca