Ali v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
Source text
Ali v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2007-10-01 Neutral citation 2007 FCA 309 File numbers A-570-06 Decision Content Date: 20071001 Docket: A-570-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 309 CORAM: NADON J.A. SEXTON J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: VAHEED ALI AKILA ALI QALSOOM ALI HARES ALI Appellants and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on October 1, 2007. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, on October 1, 2007. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: SHARLOW J.A. Date: 20071001 Docket: A-570-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 309 CORAM: NADON J.A. SEXTON J.A. SHARLOW J.A. VAHEED ALI AKILA ALI QALSOOM ALI HARES ALI Appellants and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on October 1, 2007) SHARLOW J.A. [1] The appellants are refugee claimants from Pakistan whose claims were rejected by the Refugee Protection Division (RPD). This application for judicial review was dismissed by Justice Gauthier (2006 FCA 1360). She certified a question relating to “Guideline 7” which has been rendered moot by Thamotharem v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (2007 FCA 198) and Benitez v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (2007 FCA 199). [2] The only remaining issue raised by the appellant (which was mentioned for the first time in oral submissions at the hearing of this appeal) related to …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Ali v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2007-10-01 Neutral citation 2007 FCA 309 File numbers A-570-06 Decision Content Date: 20071001 Docket: A-570-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 309 CORAM: NADON J.A. SEXTON J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: VAHEED ALI AKILA ALI QALSOOM ALI HARES ALI Appellants and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on October 1, 2007. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, on October 1, 2007. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: SHARLOW J.A. Date: 20071001 Docket: A-570-06 Citation: 2007 FCA 309 CORAM: NADON J.A. SEXTON J.A. SHARLOW J.A. VAHEED ALI AKILA ALI QALSOOM ALI HARES ALI Appellants and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on October 1, 2007) SHARLOW J.A. [1] The appellants are refugee claimants from Pakistan whose claims were rejected by the Refugee Protection Division (RPD). This application for judicial review was dismissed by Justice Gauthier (2006 FCA 1360). She certified a question relating to “Guideline 7” which has been rendered moot by Thamotharem v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (2007 FCA 198) and Benitez v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (2007 FCA 199). [2] The only remaining issue raised by the appellant (which was mentioned for the first time in oral submissions at the hearing of this appeal) related to the RPD’s determination that there is adequate state protection for the appellants in Pakistan. Justice Gauthier reviewed the RPD’s reasons and the record, and found that determination to be reasonable. The record before us discloses no error of law or any other error on the part of Justice Gauthier that warrants the intervention of this Court. [3] The appeal will be dismissed. “K. Sharlow” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-570-06 STYLE OF CAUSE: VAHEED ALI, AKILA ALI, QALSOOM ALI, HARES ALI Appellants and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent DATE OF HEARING: OCTOBER 1, 2007 PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: (NADON, SEXTON & SHARLOW JJ.A.) DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: SHARLOW J.A. APPEARANCES BY: MAX BERGER FOR THE APPELLANTS KAREENA WILDING LINDA CHEN FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: MAX BERGER PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION, TORONTO FOR THE APPELLANTS JOHN H. SIMS, Q.C. DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Klouvi c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 80