Skip to main content
Federal Court· 2001

Ambursley v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)

2001 FCT 781
AdministrativeJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Ambursley v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2001-07-06 Neutral citation 2001 FCT 781 File numbers IMM-3273-01 Decision Content Date: 20010706 Docket: IMM-3273-01 Neutral Citation: 2001FCT781 Ottawa, Ontario, this 6th day of July, 2001 Present: The Honourable Mr. Justice Nadon Between: GAVIN AMBURSLEY, Applicant, - and - THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION, Respondent. ORDER & REASONS FOR ORDER UPON MOTION on behalf of the Applicant for an interim order of prohibition or for an interim stay of the removal of the Applicant pending the final disposition of the within application for leave and for judicial review; AND UPON reading the material before the Court; AND UPON hearing counsel for the parties by telephone conference; THIS COURT ORDERS THAT: As the Applicant has not satisfied me that denying his stay application will result in irreparable harm, his application for a stay is denied. Marc Nadon Judge …

Read full judgment
Ambursley v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
Court (s) Database
Federal Court Decisions
Date
2001-07-06
Neutral citation
2001 FCT 781
File numbers
IMM-3273-01
Decision Content
Date: 20010706
Docket: IMM-3273-01
Neutral Citation: 2001FCT781
Ottawa, Ontario, this 6th day of July, 2001
Present: The Honourable Mr. Justice Nadon
Between:
GAVIN AMBURSLEY,
Applicant,
- and -
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP
AND IMMIGRATION,
Respondent.
ORDER & REASONS FOR ORDER
UPON MOTION on behalf of the Applicant for an interim order of prohibition or for an
interim stay of the removal of the Applicant pending the final disposition of the within application for leave and for judicial review;
AND UPON reading the material before the Court;
AND UPON hearing counsel for the parties by telephone conference;
THIS COURT ORDERS THAT:
As the Applicant has not satisfied me that denying his stay application will result in
irreparable harm, his application for a stay is denied.
Marc Nadon
Judge

Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca

Related cases