Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2009

Pleasant-Joseph v. Canada (Attorney General)

2009 FCA 173
AdministrativeJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Pleasant-Joseph v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2009-05-28 Neutral citation 2009 FCA 173 File numbers A-575-07 Decision Content Federal Court of Appeal CANADA Cour d'appel fédérale Date: 20090528 Docket: A-575-07 Citation: 2009 FCA 173 CORAM: NADON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. TRUDEL J.A. BETWEEN: DEBORAH PLEASANT-JOSEPH Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Halifax, Nova Scotia, on May 26, 2009. Judgment delivered at Halifax, Nova Scotia, on May 28, 2009. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: NADON J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: PELLETIER J.A. TRUDEL J.A. Federal Court of Appeal CANADA Cour d'appel fédérale Date: 20090528 Docket: A-575-07 Citation: 2009 FCA 173 CORAM: NADON J.A. PELLETIER J.A. TRUDEL J.A. BETWEEN: DEBORAH PLEASANT-JOSEPH Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT NADON J.A. [1] This is an application for judicial review of a decision of the Pension Appeals Board (the Board) dated November 13, 2007 which concluded that the applicant had failed to satisfy the provisions of the Canada Pension Plan (the Plan) so as to qualify for a disability pension. [2] Specifically, the Board concluded that the applicant had not made valid contributions for at least four of the last six years of her contributory period. In so concluding, the Board pointed out that the applicant was short by $138.00 for the year 2003, but that it did not have the power to remedy the shortfall so as to qualify the appl…

Read full judgment
Pleasant-Joseph v. Canada (Attorney General)
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2009-05-28
Neutral citation
2009 FCA 173
File numbers
A-575-07
Decision Content
Federal Court of Appeal
CANADA
Cour d'appel fédérale
Date: 20090528
Docket: A-575-07
Citation: 2009 FCA 173
CORAM: NADON J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
BETWEEN:
DEBORAH PLEASANT-JOSEPH
Applicant
and
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
Heard at Halifax, Nova Scotia, on May 26, 2009.
Judgment delivered at Halifax, Nova Scotia, on May 28, 2009.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: NADON J.A.
CONCURRED IN BY: PELLETIER J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
Federal Court of Appeal
CANADA
Cour d'appel fédérale
Date: 20090528
Docket: A-575-07
Citation: 2009 FCA 173
CORAM: NADON J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
BETWEEN:
DEBORAH PLEASANT-JOSEPH
Applicant
and
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
NADON J.A.
[1] This is an application for judicial review of a decision of the Pension Appeals Board (the Board) dated November 13, 2007 which concluded that the applicant had failed to satisfy the provisions of the Canada Pension Plan (the Plan) so as to qualify for a disability pension.
[2] Specifically, the Board concluded that the applicant had not made valid contributions for at least four of the last six years of her contributory period. In so concluding, the Board pointed out that the applicant was short by $138.00 for the year 2003, but that it did not have the power to remedy the shortfall so as to qualify the applicant for a disability pension.
[3] I am unable to find any error with the Board’s decision which would have allowed us to intervene. Like the Board, this Court is bound to apply the provisions of the Plan and cannot disregard those provisions so as to remedy what might be considered or perceived as an unfair and/or unjust result.
[4] If the applicant is of that view, and I have no doubt whatsoever that she is, it is entirely open to her to take the matter up with her Member of Parliament and attempt to convince Parliament that a legislative change is in order.
[5] For these reasons, I would dismiss the application for judicial review but, in the circumstances, without costs.
“M. Nadon”
J.A.
“I agree.
J.D. Denis Pelletier”
“I agree.
Johanne Trudel”
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-575-07
STYLE OF CAUSE: DEBORAH PLEASANT- JOSEPH v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
PLACE OF HEARING: Halifax, Nova Scotia
DATE OF HEARING: May 26, 2009
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: NADON J.A.
CONCURRED IN BY: PELLETIER J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
DATED: May 28, 2009
APPEARANCES:
Deborah Pleasant-Joseph
(on her own behalf)
FOR THE APPLICANT
Patricia Harewood
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
John H. Sims, Q.C.
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
FOR THE RESPONDENT

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases