Tourki v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)
Source text
Tourki v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2006-06-28 Neutral citation 2006 FC 822 File numbers T-498-06 Decision Content Date: 20060628 Docket: T-498-06 Citation: 2006 FC 822 Montréal, Quebec, June 28, 2006 Present: Richard Morneau, Prothonotary BETWEEN: SKANDER TOURKI Applicant and THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [1] WHEREAS the applicant’s motion by and large seeks to simply annex to the applicant’s affidavit on the merits, which was filed on time on May 1, 2006, under section 203 of the Federal Courts Rules (the applicant’s affidavit), the transcripts of testimonies to which this affidavit already refers but for which the transcripts were not available on May 1, 2006; [2] WHEREAS the delay incurred in obtaining the transcripts is not disputed by the parties in this case; [3] WHEREAS the applicant’s affidavit already takes into account and refers to the decision of Mr. Justice Harrington dated January 19, 2006, and this decision itself summarizes the testimonies of which the applicant seeks to file the transcripts; [4] WHEREAS, the Court having rendered a decision on January 19, 2006, it is obvious that, even without the filing of the transcripts in question, the respondent—because of the already existing content of the affidavit—would have had to have debated, when the application for judicial review was heard on the merits, the relevancy and th…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Tourki v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2006-06-28 Neutral citation 2006 FC 822 File numbers T-498-06 Decision Content Date: 20060628 Docket: T-498-06 Citation: 2006 FC 822 Montréal, Quebec, June 28, 2006 Present: Richard Morneau, Prothonotary BETWEEN: SKANDER TOURKI Applicant and THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [1] WHEREAS the applicant’s motion by and large seeks to simply annex to the applicant’s affidavit on the merits, which was filed on time on May 1, 2006, under section 203 of the Federal Courts Rules (the applicant’s affidavit), the transcripts of testimonies to which this affidavit already refers but for which the transcripts were not available on May 1, 2006; [2] WHEREAS the delay incurred in obtaining the transcripts is not disputed by the parties in this case; [3] WHEREAS the applicant’s affidavit already takes into account and refers to the decision of Mr. Justice Harrington dated January 19, 2006, and this decision itself summarizes the testimonies of which the applicant seeks to file the transcripts; [4] WHEREAS, the Court having rendered a decision on January 19, 2006, it is obvious that, even without the filing of the transcripts in question, the respondent—because of the already existing content of the affidavit—would have had to have debated, when the application for judicial review was heard on the merits, the relevancy and the admissibility of the applicant’s referring to testimonies which were not, in form or content, before the decision-maker on March 10, 2004; [5] WHEREAS I am not of the view that the addition of the transcripts would change this situation and cause real harm to the respondent; [6] WHEREAS, at the hearing on June 19, 2006, the parties agreed that all the evidence in docket number T-903-04 be filed should this motion be allowed; ORDER FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT ALLOWS the applicant’s motion as follows, without costs: - Within ten (10) days of this order, the applicant will serve and file in the Court record as Exhibit P-11, as an annex to the affidavit of Skander Tourki dated May 1, 2006, all the evidence (testimonies and exhibits) filed in docket number T-903-04; - The time limit specified in section 307 of the Rules will begin to run from the date of the service mentioned above. "Richard Morneau" Prothonotary Certified true translation Michael Palles FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-498-06 STYLE OF CAUSE: SKANDER TOURKI and THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec DATE OF HEARING: June 19, 2006 REASONS FOR ORDER BY: PROTHONOTARY MORNEAU DATED: June 28, 2006 APPEARANCES: Jean-Stéphane Kourie FOR THE APPLICANT Marc Ribeiro FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Choquette, Beaupré, Rhéaume Montréal, Quebec FOR THE APPLICANT John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
Klouvi c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 80