Bourgeois v. Canada (Attorney General)
Court headnote
Bourgeois v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2004-03-18 Neutral citation 2004 FCA 117 File numbers A-289-03 Decision Content Date: 20040318 Docket: A-289-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 117 CORAM: RICHARD C.J. NOËLJ.A. PELLETIERJ.A. BETWEEN: YVAN BOURGEOIS Applicant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, on March 18, 2004. Judgment delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on March 18, 2004. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: NOËL J.A. Date: 20040318 Docket: A-289-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 117 CORAM: RICHARD C.J. NOËL J.A. PELLETIERJ.A. BETWEEN: YVAN BOURGEOIS Applicant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT (Delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on March 18, 2004.) NOËL J.A. [1] It was incumbent upon the applicant to establish that all or part of the sums received as a result of his dismissal amounted to something other than earnings within the meaning of the Act (Attorney General of Canada v. Mary Radigan), [2001] 267 N.R. 129 (FCA). [2] Both the Umpire and the Board of Referees, held that the applicant was unable to discharge this burden. In our opinion, the evidence supported this finding. [3] The application for judicial review will be dismissed with costs. "Marc Noël" J.A. Certified true translation Kelley A. Harvey, BA, BCL, LLB FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-289-03 STYLE OF CAUSE: YVAN BOURGEOIS and THE ATTORNEY GE…
Read full judgment
Bourgeois v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2004-03-18 Neutral citation 2004 FCA 117 File numbers A-289-03 Decision Content Date: 20040318 Docket: A-289-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 117 CORAM: RICHARD C.J. NOËLJ.A. PELLETIERJ.A. BETWEEN: YVAN BOURGEOIS Applicant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, on March 18, 2004. Judgment delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on March 18, 2004. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: NOËL J.A. Date: 20040318 Docket: A-289-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 117 CORAM: RICHARD C.J. NOËL J.A. PELLETIERJ.A. BETWEEN: YVAN BOURGEOIS Applicant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT (Delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on March 18, 2004.) NOËL J.A. [1] It was incumbent upon the applicant to establish that all or part of the sums received as a result of his dismissal amounted to something other than earnings within the meaning of the Act (Attorney General of Canada v. Mary Radigan), [2001] 267 N.R. 129 (FCA). [2] Both the Umpire and the Board of Referees, held that the applicant was unable to discharge this burden. In our opinion, the evidence supported this finding. [3] The application for judicial review will be dismissed with costs. "Marc Noël" J.A. Certified true translation Kelley A. Harvey, BA, BCL, LLB FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-289-03 STYLE OF CAUSE: YVAN BOURGEOIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec DATE OF HEARING: March 18, 2004 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: RICHARD C.J. NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: NOËL J.A. APPEARANCES: Gilbert Nadon FOR THE APPLICANT Carole Bureau FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: OUELLET, NADON & ASSOCIÉS Montréal, Quebec FOR THE APPLICANT Morris Rosenberg Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca