R. v. Smith
Court headnote
R. v. Smith Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1993-10-06 Report [1993] 3 SCR 635 Case number 23304 Judges Sopinka, John; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley; Iacobucci, Frank On appeal from Ontario Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 23304 Decision Content R. v. Smith, [1993] 3 S.C.R. 635 Jimmy Joseph Smith Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent Indexed as: R. v. Smith File No.: 23304. 1993: October 6. Present: Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin and Iacobucci JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario Criminal law ‑‑ Theft ‑‑ Conversion ‑‑ Accused taking possession of goods after making down payment ‑‑ Accused knowing cheque for down payment would be dishonoured ‑‑ Whether person obtaining goods through fraudulent means liable to conviction for theft ‑‑ Criminal Code, R.S.C., 1985, c. C‑46, s. 322 . Statutes and Regulations Cited Criminal Code, R.S.C., 1985, c. C‑46, s. 322 . APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal (1992), 77 C.C.C. (3d) 182, 59 O.A.C. 390, dismissing an appeal from conviction by Sheard Dist. Ct. J. Appeal dismissed. Samuel Willoughby and Randall J. Hofley, for the appellant. Roger A. Pinnock, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by Iacobucci J. ‑‑ This appeal comes to us as of right. We agree, substantially for the reasons of Finlayson J.A. in the Ontario Court of Appeal, that the appellant was properly convicted of theft under s. 322 of the Crim…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
R. v. Smith Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1993-10-06 Report [1993] 3 SCR 635 Case number 23304 Judges Sopinka, John; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley; Iacobucci, Frank On appeal from Ontario Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 23304 Decision Content R. v. Smith, [1993] 3 S.C.R. 635 Jimmy Joseph Smith Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent Indexed as: R. v. Smith File No.: 23304. 1993: October 6. Present: Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin and Iacobucci JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario Criminal law ‑‑ Theft ‑‑ Conversion ‑‑ Accused taking possession of goods after making down payment ‑‑ Accused knowing cheque for down payment would be dishonoured ‑‑ Whether person obtaining goods through fraudulent means liable to conviction for theft ‑‑ Criminal Code, R.S.C., 1985, c. C‑46, s. 322 . Statutes and Regulations Cited Criminal Code, R.S.C., 1985, c. C‑46, s. 322 . APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal (1992), 77 C.C.C. (3d) 182, 59 O.A.C. 390, dismissing an appeal from conviction by Sheard Dist. Ct. J. Appeal dismissed. Samuel Willoughby and Randall J. Hofley, for the appellant. Roger A. Pinnock, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by Iacobucci J. ‑‑ This appeal comes to us as of right. We agree, substantially for the reasons of Finlayson J.A. in the Ontario Court of Appeal, that the appellant was properly convicted of theft under s. 322 of the Criminal Code, R.S.C., 1985, c. C‑46 . Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Judgment accordingly. Solicitors for the appellant: Roach, Schwartz & Associates, Toronto. Solicitor for the respondent: The Attorney General for Ontario, Toronto.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca
R v Brown
[2022] 1 SCR 506