Cassels v. Canada (Attorney General)
Source text
Cassels v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2002-06-26 Neutral citation 2002 FCA 278 File numbers A-649-01 Decision Content Date: 20020626 Docket: A-649-01 Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 278 CORAM: LÉTOURNEAU J.A. ROTHSTEIN J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: JAMES I. CASSELS Appellant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, on June 26, 2002 Judgment delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia, on June 26, 2002 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A. Date: 20020626 Docket: A-649-01 Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 278 CORAM: LÉTOURNEAU J.A. ROTHSTEIN J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: JAMES I. CASSELS Appellant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia on June 26, 2002) ROTHSTEIN J.A. [1] We have not been persuaded that there were errors of fact or law in the decision of the learned Trial Judge that would justify interference with his decision that after September 30, 1993 the appellant did not satisfy the due diligence test for directors of a corporation under the Excise Tax Act in respect of the failure of his corporation to pay GST. The appeal will be dismissed with costs. (Sgd.) "Marshall Rothstein" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-649-01 STYLE OF CAUSE: James I. Cassels v. AGC PLACE OF HEARING: Vancouver, BC DATE OF HEARING: June 26, 2002 …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Cassels v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2002-06-26 Neutral citation 2002 FCA 278 File numbers A-649-01 Decision Content Date: 20020626 Docket: A-649-01 Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 278 CORAM: LÉTOURNEAU J.A. ROTHSTEIN J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: JAMES I. CASSELS Appellant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, on June 26, 2002 Judgment delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia, on June 26, 2002 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A. Date: 20020626 Docket: A-649-01 Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 278 CORAM: LÉTOURNEAU J.A. ROTHSTEIN J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: JAMES I. CASSELS Appellant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia on June 26, 2002) ROTHSTEIN J.A. [1] We have not been persuaded that there were errors of fact or law in the decision of the learned Trial Judge that would justify interference with his decision that after September 30, 1993 the appellant did not satisfy the due diligence test for directors of a corporation under the Excise Tax Act in respect of the failure of his corporation to pay GST. The appeal will be dismissed with costs. (Sgd.) "Marshall Rothstein" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-649-01 STYLE OF CAUSE: James I. Cassels v. AGC PLACE OF HEARING: Vancouver, BC DATE OF HEARING: June 26, 2002 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT : ROTHSTEIN J.A. DATED: June 26, 2002 APPEARANCES: George F. Jones FOR THE APPELLANT Eric Douglas FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Jones Emery Hargreaves Swan FOR THE APPELLANT Victoria Morris Rosenberg FOR THE RESPONDENT Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Antrobus c. Canada
2024 CAF 143