R. v. M. (D.B.)
Court headnote
R. v. M. (D.B.) Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1991-03-26 Report [1991] 1 SCR 669 Case number 21663 Judges Lamer, Antonio; La Forest, Gérard V.; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Sopinka, John; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Cory, Peter deCarteret; Stevenson, William; McLachlin, Beverley; Iacobucci, Frank On appeal from British Columbia Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 21663 Decision Content R. v. M. (D.B.), [1991] 1 S.C.R. 669 D.B.M. Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent Indexed as: R. v. M. (D.B.) File No.: 21663. 1991: March 26. Present: Lamer C.J. and La Forest, L'Heureux‑Dubé, Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory, Stevenson, McLachlin and Iacobucci JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for british columbia Criminal law ‑‑ Sexual offences ‑‑ Evidence ‑‑ Evidence of complainant's prior sexual conduct excluded ‑‑ Whether Court of Appeal erred in finding that trial judge properly excluded evidence ‑‑ Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1970, c. C‑34, s. 142(1)(b). Statutes and Regulations Cited Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1970, c. C‑34, s. 142(1)(b) [en. 1974‑75‑76, c. 93, s. 8]. APPEAL from a judgment of the British Columbia Court of Appeal (1989), 51 C.C.C. (3d) 546, dismissing the accused's appeal from his convictions on charges of rape and indecent assault. Appeal dismissed. Peter A. Hart, for the appellant. William Ehrcke, for the respondent. //Lamer C.J.// The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by Lamer C.J. ‑‑ We find no error in the majority of the Court of Appeal for Br…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
R. v. M. (D.B.) Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1991-03-26 Report [1991] 1 SCR 669 Case number 21663 Judges Lamer, Antonio; La Forest, Gérard V.; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Sopinka, John; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Cory, Peter deCarteret; Stevenson, William; McLachlin, Beverley; Iacobucci, Frank On appeal from British Columbia Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 21663 Decision Content R. v. M. (D.B.), [1991] 1 S.C.R. 669 D.B.M. Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent Indexed as: R. v. M. (D.B.) File No.: 21663. 1991: March 26. Present: Lamer C.J. and La Forest, L'Heureux‑Dubé, Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory, Stevenson, McLachlin and Iacobucci JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for british columbia Criminal law ‑‑ Sexual offences ‑‑ Evidence ‑‑ Evidence of complainant's prior sexual conduct excluded ‑‑ Whether Court of Appeal erred in finding that trial judge properly excluded evidence ‑‑ Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1970, c. C‑34, s. 142(1)(b). Statutes and Regulations Cited Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1970, c. C‑34, s. 142(1)(b) [en. 1974‑75‑76, c. 93, s. 8]. APPEAL from a judgment of the British Columbia Court of Appeal (1989), 51 C.C.C. (3d) 546, dismissing the accused's appeal from his convictions on charges of rape and indecent assault. Appeal dismissed. Peter A. Hart, for the appellant. William Ehrcke, for the respondent. //Lamer C.J.// The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by Lamer C.J. ‑‑ We find no error in the majority of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia's refusal to interfere in the trial judge's exercise of his discretion under s. 142(1)(b) of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34, in force in 1977. We agree with the reasons of the majority in support of their conclusion and we accordingly dismiss this appeal. Judgment accordingly. Solicitor for the appellant: Peter A. Hart, Vancouver. Solicitor for the respondent: The Attorney General of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca
R v Brown
[2022] 1 SCR 506