Wajaras v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
Source text
Wajaras v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2010-02-10 Neutral citation 2010 FCA 41 File numbers A-164-09 Decision Content Federal Court of Appeal CANADA Cour d'appel fédérale Date: 20100210 Docket: A-164-09 Citation: 2010 FCA 41 CORAM: NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. LAYDEN-STEVENSON J.A. BETWEEN: JAMES WAJARAS Appellant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent Heard at Winnipeg, Manitoba, on February 10, 2010. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Winnipeg, Manitoba, on February 10, 2010. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NOËL J.A. Federal Court of Appeal CANADA Cour d'appel fédérale Date: 20100210 Docket: A-164-09 Citation: 2010 FCA 41 CORAM: NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. LAYDEN-STEVENSON J.A. BETWEEN: JAMES WAJARAS Appellant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Winnipeg, Manitoba, on February 10, 2010) NOËL J.A. [1] The Federal Court Judge certified the following question: Does the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration engage in an abuse of process in continuing to seek a removal order where the affected individual has been determined not to be a danger to the public and if so, can the Immigration Division decline to make an inadmissibility determination under section 45 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c.27 on that basis? [2] For the reasons set out by the Federal Court Judge at paragraph 13…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Wajaras v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2010-02-10 Neutral citation 2010 FCA 41 File numbers A-164-09 Decision Content Federal Court of Appeal CANADA Cour d'appel fédérale Date: 20100210 Docket: A-164-09 Citation: 2010 FCA 41 CORAM: NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. LAYDEN-STEVENSON J.A. BETWEEN: JAMES WAJARAS Appellant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent Heard at Winnipeg, Manitoba, on February 10, 2010. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Winnipeg, Manitoba, on February 10, 2010. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NOËL J.A. Federal Court of Appeal CANADA Cour d'appel fédérale Date: 20100210 Docket: A-164-09 Citation: 2010 FCA 41 CORAM: NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. LAYDEN-STEVENSON J.A. BETWEEN: JAMES WAJARAS Appellant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Winnipeg, Manitoba, on February 10, 2010) NOËL J.A. [1] The Federal Court Judge certified the following question: Does the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration engage in an abuse of process in continuing to seek a removal order where the affected individual has been determined not to be a danger to the public and if so, can the Immigration Division decline to make an inadmissibility determination under section 45 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c.27 on that basis? [2] For the reasons set out by the Federal Court Judge at paragraph 13 and 14 of his reasons, the answer to the first question is no, and there is no need to answer the second. [3] In particular, we are of the view that it is not improper for the Minister to seek a deportation order for the purpose of depriving a permanent resident of this status as a result of serious criminality, even where there are impediments to removal. [4] The appeal is accordingly dismissed. As no costs were sought none are awarded. "Marc Noël" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-164-09 APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF THE FEDERAL COURT DATED FEBRUARY 25, 2009 AND MARCH 10, 2009, IMM-2200-08 (2009 FC 200 AND 2009 FC 252). STYLE OF CAUSE: James Wajaras v. The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration PLACE OF HEARING: Winnipeg, Manitoba DATE OF HEARING: February 10, 2010 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NOËL, J.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: NOËL, J.A. APPEARANCES: David Matas FOR THE APPELLANT Nalini Reddy FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: David Matas Winnipeg, Manitoba FOR THE APPELLANT John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
R v Brown
[2022] 1 SCR 506