Yee v. The Queen
Court headnote
Yee v. The Queen Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1979-11-06 Report [1979] 2 SCR 1012 Judges Pigeon, Louis-Philippe; Beetz, Jean; Estey, Willard Zebedee; McIntyre, William Rogers; Chouinard, Julien On appeal from Saskatchewan Subjects Criminal law Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Yee v. The Queen, [1979] 2 S.C.R. 1012 Date: 1979-11-06 Shan Yee Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent. Ronald LeRoy Ross Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent. 1979: November 6. Present: Pigeon, Beetz, Estey, McIntyre and Chouinard JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR SASKATCHEWAN Criminal law—Tape recordings of intercepted private communications of accused—No requirement that transcript be certified by court stenographer—Purpose to acquaint accused with what is going to be tendered as evidence against them—Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34, s. 178.16(4)(a) (as enacted by 1973-74, c. 50, s. 2). APPEALS by the accused from a judgment of the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan[1] reversing their acquittal on a charge that they along with others conspired to traffic in a narcotic, contrary to s. 4(1) of the Narcotic Control Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. N-1, and thereby committed an offence contrary to s. 423(1)(d) of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34. Appeals dismissed. M.R. Walker, for the appellants. R. Fainstein and E.G. Ewaschuk, Q.C., for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by PIGEON J.—Having considered the argument submitted by cou…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Yee v. The Queen Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1979-11-06 Report [1979] 2 SCR 1012 Judges Pigeon, Louis-Philippe; Beetz, Jean; Estey, Willard Zebedee; McIntyre, William Rogers; Chouinard, Julien On appeal from Saskatchewan Subjects Criminal law Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Yee v. The Queen, [1979] 2 S.C.R. 1012 Date: 1979-11-06 Shan Yee Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent. Ronald LeRoy Ross Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent. 1979: November 6. Present: Pigeon, Beetz, Estey, McIntyre and Chouinard JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR SASKATCHEWAN Criminal law—Tape recordings of intercepted private communications of accused—No requirement that transcript be certified by court stenographer—Purpose to acquaint accused with what is going to be tendered as evidence against them—Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34, s. 178.16(4)(a) (as enacted by 1973-74, c. 50, s. 2). APPEALS by the accused from a judgment of the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan[1] reversing their acquittal on a charge that they along with others conspired to traffic in a narcotic, contrary to s. 4(1) of the Narcotic Control Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. N-1, and thereby committed an offence contrary to s. 423(1)(d) of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34. Appeals dismissed. M.R. Walker, for the appellants. R. Fainstein and E.G. Ewaschuk, Q.C., for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by PIGEON J.—Having considered the argument submitted by counsel for the appellant in each case we find no error in the disposition made by the Court of Appeal. The appeals are dismissed. [Page 1013] Judgment accordingly. Solicitor for the appellants: Michael R. Walker, Regina. Solicitor for the respondent: Roger Tassé, Ottawa. [1] [1977] 5 W.W.R. 454.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca
R v Brown
[2022] 1 SCR 506