Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2008

Haile v. Canada (Attorney General)

2008 FCA 193
AdministrativeJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Haile v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2008-05-27 Neutral citation 2008 FCA 193 File numbers A-573-07 Decision Content Date: 20080527 Docket: A-573-07 Citation: 2008 FCA 193 CORAM: LINDEN J.A. NADON J.A. SEXTON J.A. BETWEEN: JONAS HAILE Applicant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on May 27, 2008. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on May 27, 2008. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: LINDEN J.A. Date: 20080527 Docket: A-573-07 Citation: 2008 FCA 193 CORAM: LINDEN J.A. NADON J.A. SEXTON J.A. BETWEEN: JONAS HAILE Applicant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on May 27, 2008) LINDEN J.A. [1] We have not been persuaded that the Umpire made any error of fact or law that would warrant our intervention. [2] This application will be dismissed. “A.M. Linden” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-573-07 (AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW, UNDER SECTION 118 OF THE EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ACT, FROM A DECISION OF THE UMPIRE, JUDGE R.J. MARINE, DATED AUGUST 29, 2007, IN FILE CUB 68694.) STYLE OF CAUSE: JONAS HAILE v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: MAY 27, 2008 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: (LINDEN, NADON & SEXTON JJ.A.) DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: LINDEN J.A. DATED: MAY 27, 2008 APPEARANC…

Read full judgment
Haile v. Canada (Attorney General)
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2008-05-27
Neutral citation
2008 FCA 193
File numbers
A-573-07
Decision Content
Date: 20080527
Docket: A-573-07
Citation: 2008 FCA 193
CORAM: LINDEN J.A.
NADON J.A.
SEXTON J.A.
BETWEEN:
JONAS HAILE
Applicant
and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on May 27, 2008.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on May 27, 2008.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: LINDEN J.A.
Date: 20080527
Docket: A-573-07
Citation: 2008 FCA 193
CORAM: LINDEN J.A.
NADON J.A.
SEXTON J.A.
BETWEEN:
JONAS HAILE
Applicant
and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on May 27, 2008)
LINDEN J.A.
[1] We have not been persuaded that the Umpire made any error of fact or law that would warrant our intervention.
[2] This application will be dismissed.
“A.M. Linden”
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-573-07
(AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW, UNDER SECTION 118 OF THE EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ACT, FROM A DECISION OF THE UMPIRE, JUDGE R.J. MARINE, DATED AUGUST 29, 2007, IN FILE CUB 68694.)
STYLE OF CAUSE: JONAS HAILE v. THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF CANADA
PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO
DATE OF HEARING: MAY 27, 2008
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF
THE COURT BY: (LINDEN, NADON & SEXTON JJ.A.)
DELIVERED FROM THE
BENCH BY: LINDEN J.A.
DATED: MAY 27, 2008
APPEARANCES:
JONAS HAILE
FOR THE APPLICANT (Self-Represented)
SHARON McGOVERN
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
JONAS HAILE
TORONTO, ONTARIO
FOR THE APPLICANT (Self-Represented)
JOHN H. SIMS, Q.C.
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
TORONTO, ONTARIO
FOR THE RESPONDENT

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases