Haile v. Canada (Attorney General)
Court headnote
Haile v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2008-05-27 Neutral citation 2008 FCA 193 File numbers A-573-07 Decision Content Date: 20080527 Docket: A-573-07 Citation: 2008 FCA 193 CORAM: LINDEN J.A. NADON J.A. SEXTON J.A. BETWEEN: JONAS HAILE Applicant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on May 27, 2008. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on May 27, 2008. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: LINDEN J.A. Date: 20080527 Docket: A-573-07 Citation: 2008 FCA 193 CORAM: LINDEN J.A. NADON J.A. SEXTON J.A. BETWEEN: JONAS HAILE Applicant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on May 27, 2008) LINDEN J.A. [1] We have not been persuaded that the Umpire made any error of fact or law that would warrant our intervention. [2] This application will be dismissed. “A.M. Linden” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-573-07 (AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW, UNDER SECTION 118 OF THE EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ACT, FROM A DECISION OF THE UMPIRE, JUDGE R.J. MARINE, DATED AUGUST 29, 2007, IN FILE CUB 68694.) STYLE OF CAUSE: JONAS HAILE v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: MAY 27, 2008 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: (LINDEN, NADON & SEXTON JJ.A.) DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: LINDEN J.A. DATED: MAY 27, 2008 APPEARANC…
Read full judgment
Haile v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2008-05-27 Neutral citation 2008 FCA 193 File numbers A-573-07 Decision Content Date: 20080527 Docket: A-573-07 Citation: 2008 FCA 193 CORAM: LINDEN J.A. NADON J.A. SEXTON J.A. BETWEEN: JONAS HAILE Applicant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on May 27, 2008. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on May 27, 2008. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: LINDEN J.A. Date: 20080527 Docket: A-573-07 Citation: 2008 FCA 193 CORAM: LINDEN J.A. NADON J.A. SEXTON J.A. BETWEEN: JONAS HAILE Applicant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on May 27, 2008) LINDEN J.A. [1] We have not been persuaded that the Umpire made any error of fact or law that would warrant our intervention. [2] This application will be dismissed. “A.M. Linden” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-573-07 (AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW, UNDER SECTION 118 OF THE EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ACT, FROM A DECISION OF THE UMPIRE, JUDGE R.J. MARINE, DATED AUGUST 29, 2007, IN FILE CUB 68694.) STYLE OF CAUSE: JONAS HAILE v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: MAY 27, 2008 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: (LINDEN, NADON & SEXTON JJ.A.) DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: LINDEN J.A. DATED: MAY 27, 2008 APPEARANCES: JONAS HAILE FOR THE APPLICANT (Self-Represented) SHARON McGOVERN FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: JONAS HAILE TORONTO, ONTARIO FOR THE APPLICANT (Self-Represented) JOHN H. SIMS, Q.C. DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA TORONTO, ONTARIO FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca