Chan v. Canada
Source text
Chan v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2011-03-08 Neutral citation 2011 FCA 88 File numbers A-45-10 Decision Content Federal Court of Appeal CANADA Cour d'appel fédérale Date: 20110308 Docket: A-45-10 Citation: 2011 FCA 88 CORAM: NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. TRUDEL J.A. BETWEEN: MAN KIT TERRENCE CHAN Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Heard at Edmonton, Alberta, on March 8, 2011. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Edmonton, Alberta, on March 8, 2011. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: TRUDEL J.A. Federal Court of Appeal CANADA Cour d'appel fédérale Date: 20110308 Docket: A-45-10 Citation: 2011 FCA 88 CORAM: NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. TRUDEL J.A. BETWEEN: MAN KIT TERRENCE CHAN Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Edmonton, Alberta, on March 8, 2011) TRUDEL J.A. [1] We can find no basis for intervening in the Judge’s conclusion that the penalty imposed on the appellant under subsection 163(2) of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (5th supplement) was properly assessed by the Minister. This appeal will be dismissed with costs. “Johanne Trudel” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-45-10 (APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE JUDITH WOODS DATED JANUARY 7, 2007, DOCKET NO. 2006-1747(IT)G) STYLE OF CAUSE: MAN KIT TERRENCE CHAN v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN PLACE OF HEARING: Edmonton, Alberta DATE OF HEARING:…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Chan v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2011-03-08 Neutral citation 2011 FCA 88 File numbers A-45-10 Decision Content Federal Court of Appeal CANADA Cour d'appel fédérale Date: 20110308 Docket: A-45-10 Citation: 2011 FCA 88 CORAM: NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. TRUDEL J.A. BETWEEN: MAN KIT TERRENCE CHAN Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Heard at Edmonton, Alberta, on March 8, 2011. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Edmonton, Alberta, on March 8, 2011. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: TRUDEL J.A. Federal Court of Appeal CANADA Cour d'appel fédérale Date: 20110308 Docket: A-45-10 Citation: 2011 FCA 88 CORAM: NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. TRUDEL J.A. BETWEEN: MAN KIT TERRENCE CHAN Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Edmonton, Alberta, on March 8, 2011) TRUDEL J.A. [1] We can find no basis for intervening in the Judge’s conclusion that the penalty imposed on the appellant under subsection 163(2) of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (5th supplement) was properly assessed by the Minister. This appeal will be dismissed with costs. “Johanne Trudel” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-45-10 (APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE JUDITH WOODS DATED JANUARY 7, 2007, DOCKET NO. 2006-1747(IT)G) STYLE OF CAUSE: MAN KIT TERRENCE CHAN v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN PLACE OF HEARING: Edmonton, Alberta DATE OF HEARING: March 8, 2011 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: (NOËL, PELLETIER & TRUDEL JJ.A.) DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: TRUDEL J.A. APPEARANCES: Nathan J. Whitling FOR THE APPELLANT Marta E. Burns Adam Gotfried FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Parlee McLaws LLP Barristers and Solicitors Edmonton, Alberta FOR THE APPELLANT Myles J. Kirvan Deputy Attorney General for Canada Edmonton, Alberta FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Antrobus c. Canada
2024 CAF 143