R. v. Mullins-Johnson
Court headnote
R. v. Mullins-Johnson Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1998-05-26 Report [1998] 1 SCR 977 Case number 25860 Judges L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; McLachlin, Beverley; Bastarache, Michel; Binnie, William Ian Corneil On appeal from Ontario Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 25860 Decision Content R. v. Mullins‑Johnson, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 977 William Mullins‑Johnson Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent Indexed as: R. v. Mullins‑Johnson File No.: 25860. 1998: May 26. Present: L’Heureux‑Dubé, Gonthier, McLachlin, Bastarache and Binnie JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario Criminal law ‑‑ Charge to jury ‑‑ Trial judge adequately explaining defence position to jury. APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal (1996), 31 O.R. (3d) 660, 96 O.A.C. 212, 112 C.C.C. (3d) 117, [1996] O.J. No. 4459 (QL), dismissing the accused’s appeal from his conviction on a charge of first degree murder. Appeal dismissed. Michael Lomer, for the appellant. Scott C. Hutchison and Philip Downes, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by 1 L’Heureux‑Dubé J. ‑‑ This is an appeal as of right. We are all of the view that this appeal be dismissed for the reasons of the majority of the Court of Appeal. Judgment accordingly. Solicitors for the appellant: Lomer, Frost, Toronto. Solicitor for the respondent: The Ministry of the Attorney General, Toronto. …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
R. v. Mullins-Johnson Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1998-05-26 Report [1998] 1 SCR 977 Case number 25860 Judges L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; McLachlin, Beverley; Bastarache, Michel; Binnie, William Ian Corneil On appeal from Ontario Subjects Criminal law Notes SCC Case Information: 25860 Decision Content R. v. Mullins‑Johnson, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 977 William Mullins‑Johnson Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent Indexed as: R. v. Mullins‑Johnson File No.: 25860. 1998: May 26. Present: L’Heureux‑Dubé, Gonthier, McLachlin, Bastarache and Binnie JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario Criminal law ‑‑ Charge to jury ‑‑ Trial judge adequately explaining defence position to jury. APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal (1996), 31 O.R. (3d) 660, 96 O.A.C. 212, 112 C.C.C. (3d) 117, [1996] O.J. No. 4459 (QL), dismissing the accused’s appeal from his conviction on a charge of first degree murder. Appeal dismissed. Michael Lomer, for the appellant. Scott C. Hutchison and Philip Downes, for the respondent. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by 1 L’Heureux‑Dubé J. ‑‑ This is an appeal as of right. We are all of the view that this appeal be dismissed for the reasons of the majority of the Court of Appeal. Judgment accordingly. Solicitors for the appellant: Lomer, Frost, Toronto. Solicitor for the respondent: The Ministry of the Attorney General, Toronto.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca
R v Brown
[2022] 1 SCR 506