Pajazitaj v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)
Source text
Pajazitaj v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2019-05-13 Neutral citation 2019 FC 644 File numbers IMM-1222-18 Decision Content Date: 20190513 Docket: IMM-1222-18 Citation: 2019 FC 644 Ottawa, Ontario, May 13, 2019 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Norris BETWEEN: AZLLAN PAJAZITAJ Applicant and THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Respondent SUPPLEMENTARY JUDGMENT AND REASONS [1] On April 30, 2019, the Court released the Judgment and Reasons in this matter dismissing the application for judicial review. [2] As part of the Court’s Judgment, counsel were asked to provide written submissions with respect to whether any serious question of general importance should be certified under section 74(d) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act no later than 4:00 p.m. EST on May 7, 2019. [3] Both parties acknowledged receiving the Judgment and Reasons on April 30, 2019. [4] On May 6, 2019, counsel for the respondent wrote to indicate that, in his view, no questions for certification arise from the Court’s decision. [5] To date, counsel for the applicant has not communicated any position, nor has he requested an extension of time to do so. [6] I am satisfied that no questions of general importance warranting certification arise and none will be stated. JUDGMENT IN IMM-1222-18 THIS COURT’S JUDGMENT is that No question of general importance is stated. “John Norris” Judge FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF …
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Pajazitaj v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2019-05-13 Neutral citation 2019 FC 644 File numbers IMM-1222-18 Decision Content Date: 20190513 Docket: IMM-1222-18 Citation: 2019 FC 644 Ottawa, Ontario, May 13, 2019 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Norris BETWEEN: AZLLAN PAJAZITAJ Applicant and THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Respondent SUPPLEMENTARY JUDGMENT AND REASONS [1] On April 30, 2019, the Court released the Judgment and Reasons in this matter dismissing the application for judicial review. [2] As part of the Court’s Judgment, counsel were asked to provide written submissions with respect to whether any serious question of general importance should be certified under section 74(d) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act no later than 4:00 p.m. EST on May 7, 2019. [3] Both parties acknowledged receiving the Judgment and Reasons on April 30, 2019. [4] On May 6, 2019, counsel for the respondent wrote to indicate that, in his view, no questions for certification arise from the Court’s decision. [5] To date, counsel for the applicant has not communicated any position, nor has he requested an extension of time to do so. [6] I am satisfied that no questions of general importance warranting certification arise and none will be stated. JUDGMENT IN IMM-1222-18 THIS COURT’S JUDGMENT is that No question of general importance is stated. “John Norris” Judge FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-1222-18 STYLE OF CAUSE: AZLLAN PAJAZITAJ v THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: OctOber 31, 2018 SUPPLEMENTARY JUDGMENT AND REASONS: NORRIS J. DATED: May 13, 2019 APPEARANCES: Michael Loebach For The Applicant Lorne McClenaghan For The Respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Michael Loebach Barrister and Solicitor London, Ontario For The Applicant Attorney General of Canada Toronto, Ontario For The Respondent
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
Klouvi c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 80