Beaulieu v. Canada (Service Correctionnel)
Court headnote
Beaulieu v. Canada (Service Correctionnel) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2003-07-22 Neutral citation 2003 FC 909 File numbers T-2056-00 Decision Content Date: 20030722 Docket: T-2056-00 Citation: 2003 FC 909 BETWEEN: DAVE BEAULIEU Plaintiff and CORRECTIONAL SERVICE OF CANADA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Defendants ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS DIANE PERRIER - ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] On November 8, 2002, Pinard J. dismissed the application for judicial review with costs. [2] On May 7, 2003, Sébastien Gagné, counsel for the defendants, filed a bill of costs and asked that it be assessed without a personal appearance by the parties. On June 10, 2003, we sent letters to the parties setting a schedule for the filing of their written submissions. As no written submission has been filed to date, I am prepared to assess the costs based on the documentation in the record. [3] The fees requested are allowed, except for items 26 and 27. Item 26 is reduced to 2 units as there was no opposition. Item 27 cannot be allowed, since no sum is provided for the appearance in Tariff B. [4] Disbursements in the amount of $1,354.06 are awarded, since they are regarded as reasonable and were proven by Lyne Lasalle's affidavit. [5] The bill of costs is accordingly assessed and allowed in the amount of $2,949.06. An assessment certificate will be issued for that amount. "Diane Perrier" Assessment Officer QUÉBEC, QUEBEC July 22, 2003 Certified true translation Suzanne M. Gauthier, C.…
Read full judgment
Beaulieu v. Canada (Service Correctionnel) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2003-07-22 Neutral citation 2003 FC 909 File numbers T-2056-00 Decision Content Date: 20030722 Docket: T-2056-00 Citation: 2003 FC 909 BETWEEN: DAVE BEAULIEU Plaintiff and CORRECTIONAL SERVICE OF CANADA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Defendants ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS DIANE PERRIER - ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] On November 8, 2002, Pinard J. dismissed the application for judicial review with costs. [2] On May 7, 2003, Sébastien Gagné, counsel for the defendants, filed a bill of costs and asked that it be assessed without a personal appearance by the parties. On June 10, 2003, we sent letters to the parties setting a schedule for the filing of their written submissions. As no written submission has been filed to date, I am prepared to assess the costs based on the documentation in the record. [3] The fees requested are allowed, except for items 26 and 27. Item 26 is reduced to 2 units as there was no opposition. Item 27 cannot be allowed, since no sum is provided for the appearance in Tariff B. [4] Disbursements in the amount of $1,354.06 are awarded, since they are regarded as reasonable and were proven by Lyne Lasalle's affidavit. [5] The bill of costs is accordingly assessed and allowed in the amount of $2,949.06. An assessment certificate will be issued for that amount. "Diane Perrier" Assessment Officer QUÉBEC, QUEBEC July 22, 2003 Certified true translation Suzanne M. Gauthier, C. Tr., LL.L. FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION SOLICITORS OF RECORD FILE: T-2056-00 STYLE OF CAUSE: DAVE BEAULIEU Plaintiff and CORRECTIONAL SERVICE OF CANADA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Defendants ASSESSMENT OF COSTS WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Québec, Quebec REASONS BY: DIANE PERRIER, ASSESSMENT OFFICER DATE OF REASONS: July 22, 2003 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Sébastien St-Laurent FOR THE PLAINTIFF Québec, Quebec Sébastien Gagné FOR THE DEFENDANTS Ottawa, Ontario
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca