McNeil v. Canada (Attorney General)
Source text
McNeil v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2002-06-18 Neutral citation 2002 FCA 263 File numbers A-288-99 Decision Content Date: 20020618 Docket: A-288-99 Neutral Citation: 2002 FCA 263 Between: JOHN MCNEIL Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] On February 2, 2001, the Court of Appeal dismissed this application for judicial review with costs. At the request of the respondent, assessment took place without personal appearance of the parties. It should be noted that the applicant did not file any representations with respect to the respondent's bill of costs. [2] In his bill, the respondent is claiming $1,650.00 for services rendered under column III of Tariff B for items 2 (5 units), 13 (3 units), 14 (2 units), 25 (1 unit) and 26 (4 units). With the exception of item 26, the number of units claimed is allowed. Two units are allowed under item 26 given that the assessment of costs has not been contested. This is also the case for the disbursements, which are allowed in the amount of $433.36. Page: 2 [3] Costs of the respondent resulting from this appeal are assessed and allowed in the amount of $1,863.36. A certificate is issued for that amount. MICHELLE LAMY ASSESSMENT OFFICER MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC June 18, 2002 Certified true translation S. Debbané, LLB FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL SOLICITORS OF RECORD COURT FILE NO.: A-288-99 Between: JOHN MCNEIL Applica…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
McNeil v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2002-06-18 Neutral citation 2002 FCA 263 File numbers A-288-99 Decision Content Date: 20020618 Docket: A-288-99 Neutral Citation: 2002 FCA 263 Between: JOHN MCNEIL Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] On February 2, 2001, the Court of Appeal dismissed this application for judicial review with costs. At the request of the respondent, assessment took place without personal appearance of the parties. It should be noted that the applicant did not file any representations with respect to the respondent's bill of costs. [2] In his bill, the respondent is claiming $1,650.00 for services rendered under column III of Tariff B for items 2 (5 units), 13 (3 units), 14 (2 units), 25 (1 unit) and 26 (4 units). With the exception of item 26, the number of units claimed is allowed. Two units are allowed under item 26 given that the assessment of costs has not been contested. This is also the case for the disbursements, which are allowed in the amount of $433.36. Page: 2 [3] Costs of the respondent resulting from this appeal are assessed and allowed in the amount of $1,863.36. A certificate is issued for that amount. MICHELLE LAMY ASSESSMENT OFFICER MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC June 18, 2002 Certified true translation S. Debbané, LLB FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL SOLICITORS OF RECORD COURT FILE NO.: A-288-99 Between: JOHN MCNEIL Applicant AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal, Quebec REASONS OF MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER DATE OF REASONS: June18, 2002 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Morris Rosenberg Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario For the Respondent FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL Date: 20020618 Docket: A-288-99 BETWEEN: JOHN MCNEIL Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Klouvi c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 80