Buffett v. Canadian Forces
Court headnote
Buffett v. Canadian Forces Collection Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Date 2008-02-13 Neutral citation 2008 CHRT 4 File number(s) T979/9604 Decision-maker(s) Hadjis, Athanasios Decision type Decision Decision Content TERRY BUFFETT Complainant - and - CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION Commission - and - CANADIAN FORCES Respondent DECISION MEMBER: Athanasios D. Hadjis 2008 CHRT 4 2008/02/13 [1] In a judgment dated October 16, 2007, the Federal Court set aside my decision in the present case and referred it back to the Tribunal for redetermination (Attorney General of Canada v. Buffett, 2007 FC 1061). The Court's Order stated that there is no need for the Tribunal to conduct an additional hearing and that Mr. Buffett's complaint is to be redetermined in accordance with the reasons of the Court, in particular, paragraphs 55 and 56 and following. [2] It was pointed out in the judgment that if the matter had consisted of an appeal of the Tribunal's decision rather than a judicial review, the Court would have ordered the Canadian Forces (CF) to fund the intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) portion of Mr. Buffett's treatment to a maximum of three cycles. The Court noted, however, that during the judicial review hearing, Mr. Buffett stated that given his and his spouse's current ages, it is no longer recommended that they seek in vitro fertilization (IVF) and ICSI treatments. Consequently, the Court concluded that the issuance of such an order has now been rendered moot. Accordingly…
Read full judgment
Buffett v. Canadian Forces Collection Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Date 2008-02-13 Neutral citation 2008 CHRT 4 File number(s) T979/9604 Decision-maker(s) Hadjis, Athanasios Decision type Decision Decision Content TERRY BUFFETT Complainant - and - CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION Commission - and - CANADIAN FORCES Respondent DECISION MEMBER: Athanasios D. Hadjis 2008 CHRT 4 2008/02/13 [1] In a judgment dated October 16, 2007, the Federal Court set aside my decision in the present case and referred it back to the Tribunal for redetermination (Attorney General of Canada v. Buffett, 2007 FC 1061). The Court's Order stated that there is no need for the Tribunal to conduct an additional hearing and that Mr. Buffett's complaint is to be redetermined in accordance with the reasons of the Court, in particular, paragraphs 55 and 56 and following. [2] It was pointed out in the judgment that if the matter had consisted of an appeal of the Tribunal's decision rather than a judicial review, the Court would have ordered the Canadian Forces (CF) to fund the intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) portion of Mr. Buffett's treatment to a maximum of three cycles. The Court noted, however, that during the judicial review hearing, Mr. Buffett stated that given his and his spouse's current ages, it is no longer recommended that they seek in vitro fertilization (IVF) and ICSI treatments. Consequently, the Court concluded that the issuance of such an order has now been rendered moot. Accordingly, the present decision does not contain such an order. [3] In addition, the parties have confirmed to the Tribunal that that the CF has paid in full the pain and suffering award resulting from my decision of September 15, 2006, which award was undisturbed by the Court in its judgment of October 16, 2007. I do not think it necessary, therefore, for me to re-issue this order. [4] Thus, for the reasons given by the Court, I hereby make the following order: Pursuant to s. 53(2)(a) of the Canadian Human Rights Act, I order the Canadian Forces to take measures, in consultation with the Commission on the general purposes of the measures, to amend its policy such that as long as the Canadian Forces continues to fund in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments for its female members, male members shall receive funding for the intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) portion of their infertility treatments. Signed by Athanasios D. Hadjis OTTAWA, Ontario February 13, 2008 PARTIES OF RECORD TRIBUNAL FILE: T979/9604 STYLE OF CAUSE: Terry Buffett v. Canadian Forces DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED: February 13, 2008 APPEARANCES: Terry Buffett For himself Giacomo Vigna For the Canadian Human Rights Commission Elizabeth Richards For the Respondent
Source: decisions.chrt-tcdp.gc.ca