Buffalo v. Canada

Buffalo v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court Decisions
Date
2002-08-19
Neutral citation
2002 FCT 889
File numbers
T-2022-89
Decision Content
Date: 20020819
Docket: T-2022-89/T-1254-92
Neutral citation: 2002 FCT 889
CALGARY, Alberta, Monday, the 19th day of August, 2002.
PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE TEITELBAUM
T-2022-89
BETWEEN:
CHIEF VICTOR BUFFALO acting on his own behalf and on behalf of all of the other members of the Samson Indian Nation and Band
- and -
THE SAMSON INDIAN BAND AND NATION,
PLAINTIFFS
AND
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA, THE MINISTER OF INDIAN
AFFAIRS AND NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT and THE MINISTER OF FINANCE
DEFENDANTS
AND
CHIEF JEROME MORIN acting on his own behalf as well as on behalf of all the MEMBERS OF ENOCH'S BAND OF INDIANS AND THE RESIDENTS THEREOF ON AND OF STONY PLAIN RESERVE NO. 135
INTERVENORS
AND
EMILY STOYKA and SARA SCHUG
INTERVENORS
AND BETWEEN:
T-1254-92
CHIEF ERMINESKIN, LAWRENCE WILDCAT, GORDON LEE, ART LITTLECHILD, MAURICE WOLFE, CURTIS ERMINESKIN, GERRY ERMINESKIN, EARL ERMINESKIN, RICK WOLFE, KEN CUTARM, BRIAN LEE, LESTER FRAYNN, the elected Chief and Councillors of the Ermineskin Indian Band and Nations suing on their own behalf and on behalf of all the other members of the Ermineskin Indian Band and Nation
Plaintiffs
- and -
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA, THE MINISTER OF INDIAN AFFAIRS AND NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT AND THE MINISTER OF FINANCE
Defendants
REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER
TEITELBAUM, J.:
[1] The Defendant Crown has filed into the Office of the Registry of the Federal Court a motion for an Order pursuant to Rules 271 and 273 of the Federal Court Rules, 1998 to allow the evidence of Crown witness Mr. E. A. Moore to be taken outside of Court and recorded on videotape.
[2] I agree with the Crown, that given Mr. Moore's age (he is presently 81 years of age), his importance as a witness for the Crown, and the length of time it will likely take before the Crown will present its defence during the oil and gas phase of the proceedings, the evidence of this witness must be taken outside of Court so that it is preserved and available for the Court.
[3] However, in the event that Mr. Moore is alive, physically well and available when the Oil and Gas phase comes to trial, he will give his evidence in Court at that time. Any videotapes and transcripts stemming from his out of Court testimony will be duly disregarded. In making this particular, and in my opinion important point, I am guided by the recent Judgment of the Honourable Mr. Justice Hugessen in Dene Tsaa First Nation v. Canada, [2002] F.C.J. No. 1107. In that case, Mr. Justice Hugessen granted an Order permitting the Crown to examine a witness on commission and out of Court prior to trial. The witness was of advanced years, had experienced some health problems, and was a potentially important witness. The Court went on to note that an Order for the out of Court examination of a witness who is in Canada, is always made de bene esse, for what it may be worth; if the witness is alive and available at the time of trial, he is to give his evidence in that forum.
ORDER
UPON MOTION on behalf of Her Majesty the Queen for an Order pursuant to Rules 271and 273 of the Federal Court Rules, permitting the Crown to have the evidence of Mr. E. A. Moore on the oil and gas phase of these proceedings taken out of Court, and that the evidence be recorded on videotape,
THIS COURT ORDERS that,
1. The motion made by the defendant Crown seeking an Order pursuant to Federal Court Rules 271 and 273 is allowed, in that the witness, Mr. E. A. Moore, may give evidence outside of Court on the oil and gas issue before any other person appointed by the Associate Chief Justice or his representative, at a time approved by the Associate Chief Justice or his representative;
2 That the said examination shall take place no later than during the month of August 2003;
3. That the said examination shall be videotaped;
4. The costs of the videotaping shall be paid by the Defendant Crown; and
5. All other costs arising from the examination of Mr. Moore are to be addressed at a later date.
"Max M. Teitelbaum"
J. F. C. C.
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKETS: T-2022-89 and T-1254-92
STYLE OF CAUSE: Chief Victor Buffalo et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen et al.
Chief John Ermineskin et al. v. Her Majesty the
Queen et al.
PLACE OF HEARING: CALGARY, Alberta
DATE OF HEARING: July 16, 2002
REASONS FOR ORDER
AND ORDER : TEITELBAUM, J.
DATED: August 19, 2002
APPEARANCES:
Mr. Ed Molstad, Q.C. FOR PLAINTIFF SAMSON
T-2022-89
Ms. Maria Morellato FOR PLAINTIFF
ERMINESKIN
T-1254-92
Mr. Allan Macleod, Q.C.
Mr. Clarke Hunter FOR HER MAJESTY THE
Mr. Ray Chartier QUEEN
Mr. S. H. (Stan) Rutwind FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL
FOR ALBERTA
- 2 -
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Parlee McLaws FOR PLAINTIFF SAMSON
Edmonton, Alberta T-2022-89
Blake, Cassels & Graydon FOR PLAINTIFF
Vancouver, British Columbia ERMINESKIN
T-1254-92
Macleod Dixon LLP FOR HER MAJESTY THE
Calgary, Alberta QUEEN
Alberta Justice Constitutional FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL
& Aboriginal Law FOR ALBERTA
Edmonton, Alberta