Yafu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
Source text
Yafu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2016-02-03 Neutral citation 2016 FC 125 File numbers IMM-194-16 Decision Content Date: 20160203 Docket: IMM-194-16 Citation: 2016 FC 125 Toronto, Ontario, February 3, 2016 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice O'Reilly BETWEEN: SURASAK YAFU Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent ORDER AND REASONS [1] Mr Surasak Yafu seeks an order staying his removal from Canada for Thailand on February 13, 2016 pending a final determination of his application for leave and judicial review of a negative pre-removal risk assessment (PRRA). [2] In my view, Mr Yafu has failed to meet the three-part test for a stay, and I must, therefore, dismiss his motion. I. Serious Issue [3] Mr Yafu submits that the officer who carried out his PRRA failed to take adequate account of the numerous news sources he relied on to show the risk he would face from loan sharks in Thailand. However, the officer found some of the articles to be irrelevant because they pre-dated Mr Yafu’s prior negative refugee determination. The officer found others to be unreliable. Further, the officer noted that some of the sources showed that police are addressing the problem with loan-sharking in Thailand. [4] I can see no serious issue arising from the officer’s treatment of the evidence Mr Yafu presented. II. Irreparable Harm and Balance of Convenience [5] Given my conclusion on a serious issue, it is not, stri…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Yafu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2016-02-03 Neutral citation 2016 FC 125 File numbers IMM-194-16 Decision Content Date: 20160203 Docket: IMM-194-16 Citation: 2016 FC 125 Toronto, Ontario, February 3, 2016 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice O'Reilly BETWEEN: SURASAK YAFU Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent ORDER AND REASONS [1] Mr Surasak Yafu seeks an order staying his removal from Canada for Thailand on February 13, 2016 pending a final determination of his application for leave and judicial review of a negative pre-removal risk assessment (PRRA). [2] In my view, Mr Yafu has failed to meet the three-part test for a stay, and I must, therefore, dismiss his motion. I. Serious Issue [3] Mr Yafu submits that the officer who carried out his PRRA failed to take adequate account of the numerous news sources he relied on to show the risk he would face from loan sharks in Thailand. However, the officer found some of the articles to be irrelevant because they pre-dated Mr Yafu’s prior negative refugee determination. The officer found others to be unreliable. Further, the officer noted that some of the sources showed that police are addressing the problem with loan-sharking in Thailand. [4] I can see no serious issue arising from the officer’s treatment of the evidence Mr Yafu presented. II. Irreparable Harm and Balance of Convenience [5] Given my conclusion on a serious issue, it is not, strictly speaking, necessary to consider the other two branches of the test for a stay. However, I would note that the risk Mr Yafu alleges he will face in Thailand has twice been considered and twice found not to be well-founded. That same risk allegation cannot amount to irreparable harm. It follows that the balance of convenience favours the Minister. ORDER THIS COURT ORDERS that the motion is denied. "James W. O'Reilly" Judge FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-194-16 STYLE OF CAUSE: SURASAK YAFU v THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: February 2, 2016 ORDER AND REASONS: O'REILLY J. DATED: February 3, 2016 APPEARANCES: Surasak Yafu (Self-Represented) For The Applicant Nimanthika Kaneira FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: William F. Pentney Deputy Attorney General Toronto, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
Klouvi c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 80