Savard v. Canada (Attorney General)
Court headnote
Savard v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2003-03-26 Neutral citation 2003 FCT 350 File numbers T-300-02 Decision Content Date: 20030326 Docket: T-300-02 Citation: 2003 FCT 350 Montréal, Quebec, March 26, 2003 Present: Mr. Richard Morneau, Prothonotary BETWEEN: JEAN-GUY SAVARD Applicant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [1] Given the notice of status review issued on January 13, 2003; [2] Given the written observations submitted by the parties pursuant to this notice; [3] Given that the Court is satisfied, for the reasons expressed by counsel for the respondent, that the various orders issued in the past in this case and the necessary time elapsed mean that the applicant is now foreclosed from serving and filing any document needed to advance his application for judicial review; [4] Given as well that the remedy sought by the applicant on the merits has become moot; [5] Given, further, that written observations in reply to a notice of status review are not the appropriate vehicle for arguing multiple and various recriminations against conditions of detention and that, just in case, the Court is not persuaded in this case that the applicant is actually foreclosed from pursuing any recourse in this regard; [6] Given the preceding reasons, it is appropriate to order as follows: ORDER THE COURT ORDERS that, pursuant to paragraph 382(2)(a) of the Federal Court Rules, 1998, the application is dismisse…
Read full judgment
Savard v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2003-03-26 Neutral citation 2003 FCT 350 File numbers T-300-02 Decision Content Date: 20030326 Docket: T-300-02 Citation: 2003 FCT 350 Montréal, Quebec, March 26, 2003 Present: Mr. Richard Morneau, Prothonotary BETWEEN: JEAN-GUY SAVARD Applicant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [1] Given the notice of status review issued on January 13, 2003; [2] Given the written observations submitted by the parties pursuant to this notice; [3] Given that the Court is satisfied, for the reasons expressed by counsel for the respondent, that the various orders issued in the past in this case and the necessary time elapsed mean that the applicant is now foreclosed from serving and filing any document needed to advance his application for judicial review; [4] Given as well that the remedy sought by the applicant on the merits has become moot; [5] Given, further, that written observations in reply to a notice of status review are not the appropriate vehicle for arguing multiple and various recriminations against conditions of detention and that, just in case, the Court is not persuaded in this case that the applicant is actually foreclosed from pursuing any recourse in this regard; [6] Given the preceding reasons, it is appropriate to order as follows: ORDER THE COURT ORDERS that, pursuant to paragraph 382(2)(a) of the Federal Court Rules, 1998, the application is dismissed. This order is applicable mutatis mutandis to and will be placed in docket T-662-02. "Richard Morneau" Prothonotary Certified true translation Suzanne Gauthier, C. Tr., LL.L. FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION Date: 20030326 Docket: T-300-02 Between: JEAN-GUY SAVARD Applicant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-300-02 STYLE: JEAN-GUY SAVARD Applicant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent WRITTEN MOTION EXAMINED IN MONTRÉAL WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES REASONS FOR ORDER OF RICHARD MORNEAU, PROTHONOTARY DATED: March 26, 2003 APPEARANCES: Jean-Guy Savard for the applicant Michelle Lavergne for the respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Morris Rosenberg for the respondent Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca