Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2002

Canadian Council of Railway Operating Unions c. Adams

2002 FCA 399
AdministrativeJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Canadian Council of Railway Operating Unions c. Adams Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2002-10-18 Neutral citation 2002 FCA 399 File numbers A-719-00 Decision Content Date: 20021018 Docket: A-719-00 Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 399 Between: THE CANADIAN COUNCIL OF RAILWAY OPERATING UNIONS Plaintiff and ROBERT ADAMS and CANADIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS BOARD and COMPAGNIE DE CHEMIN DE FER ST-LAURENT & HUDSON LIMITÉE Defendants ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is an application for judicial review dismissed with costs in favour of the defendant Robert Adams only. [2] Based on the parties' written submissions, the defendant's fees are allowed in the amount of $2,467.29 (that is, $2,145.00 plus tax) for the following services covered by Tariff B: - 7 units under item 2 for preparation of the defendant's record, filed pursuant to Rule 310 of the Federal Court Rules (1998), which includes his affidavit and his memorandum of fact and law; - 3 units under item 14(a) for hearing of the application for judicial review in the amount of $825.00, that is, 3 units x $110.00/unit x 2.5 hours (actual time of hearing in Court of Appeal); - 1 unit under item 25 for services after judgment; - 4 units under item 26 for assessment of costs. [3] The disbursements incurred in this case were not disputed and are awarded as requested in the amount of $872.61. [4] The defendant Robert Adams' bill of costs is accordingly assessed and allowed i…

Read full judgment
Canadian Council of Railway Operating Unions c. Adams
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2002-10-18
Neutral citation
2002 FCA 399
File numbers
A-719-00
Decision Content
Date: 20021018
Docket: A-719-00
Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 399
Between:
THE CANADIAN COUNCIL OF RAILWAY OPERATING UNIONS
Plaintiff
and
ROBERT ADAMS
and
CANADIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS BOARD
and
COMPAGNIE DE CHEMIN DE FER ST-LAURENT & HUDSON LIMITÉE
Defendants
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER
[1] This is an application for judicial review dismissed with costs in favour of the defendant Robert Adams only.
[2] Based on the parties' written submissions, the defendant's fees are allowed in the amount of $2,467.29 (that is, $2,145.00 plus tax) for the following services covered by Tariff B:
- 7 units under item 2 for preparation of the defendant's record, filed pursuant to Rule 310 of the Federal Court Rules (1998), which includes his affidavit and his memorandum of fact and law;
- 3 units under item 14(a) for hearing of the application for judicial review in the amount of $825.00, that is, 3 units x $110.00/unit x 2.5 hours (actual time of hearing in Court of Appeal);
- 1 unit under item 25 for services after judgment;
- 4 units under item 26 for assessment of costs.
[3] The disbursements incurred in this case were not disputed and are awarded as requested in the amount of $872.61.
[4] The defendant Robert Adams' bill of costs is accordingly assessed and allowed in the amount of $3,339.90. A certificate is issued for that amount.
"Michelle Lamy"
Assessment Officer
MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC
October 18, 2002
Certified true translation
Suzanne M. Gauthier, C. Tr., LL.L.
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
APPEAL DIVISION
Date: 20021018
Docket: A-719-00
BETWEEN:
THE CANADIAN COUNCIL OF RAILWAY OPERATING UNIONS
Plaintiff
and
ROBERT ADAMS
and
CANADIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS BOARD
and
COMPAGNIE DE CHEMIN DE FER ST-LAURENT & HUDSON LIMITÉE
Defendants
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
APPEAL DIVISION
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
COURT FILE No.: A-719-00
Between: THE CANADIAN COUNCIL OF RAILWAY OPERATING UNIONS
and
ROBERT ADAMS
and
CANADIAN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS BOARD
and
COMPAGNIE DE CHEMIN DE FER ST-LAURENT & HUDSON LIMITÉE
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE
PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal, Quebec
REASONS BY: MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER
DATE OF REASONS: October 18, 2002
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Caley & Wray for the plaintiff
Toronto, Ontario
Schurman, Longo & Duggan for the defendant Robert Adams
Montréal, Quebec
Canadien Pacifique Limitée for the defendants Canada Industrial
Calgary, Alberta Relations Board and Compagnie de chemin de fer St-Laurent & Hudson Limitée

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases