Ewonde v. Canada (Attorney General)
Source text
Ewonde v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2006-10-06 Neutral citation 2006 FC 1198 File numbers T-734-05 Decision Content Date: 20061006 Docket: T-734-05 Citation: 2006 FC 1198 Between: SERGE EWONDE Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS – REASONS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is the assessment of the respondent’s bill of costs following the judgment dated December 14, 2005, dismissing this application for judicial review. [2] On July 17, 2006, I sent a schedule to the parties regarding the service and filing of written representations. As of today, I have not received a response, and am ready to proceed with the assessment on the basis of the proceedings in the record. [3] The fees are fixed at $2,250 for the services rendered under items 2 (7 units), 13 (5 units) 14 (3 units x 1 h 15 min.), 25 (1 unit) and 26 (2 units) of Tariff B. The claim under item 27 is denied, as there is nothing in the respondent’s bill of costs to justify it. I also reduced the number of units for the assessment of costs to two, since this is a simple, uncontested matter. [4] The disbursements of $255.11, which have been established by affidavit, are allowed as claimed. [5] In light of the foregoing, the respondent’s costs are fixed in the amount of $2,505.11, and a certificate is issued for that amount. MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC, THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2006 Signed: “Michelle Lamy” MICHELLE LAMY ASSESSMENT OFFICER Certifi…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Ewonde v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2006-10-06 Neutral citation 2006 FC 1198 File numbers T-734-05 Decision Content Date: 20061006 Docket: T-734-05 Citation: 2006 FC 1198 Between: SERGE EWONDE Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS – REASONS MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] This is the assessment of the respondent’s bill of costs following the judgment dated December 14, 2005, dismissing this application for judicial review. [2] On July 17, 2006, I sent a schedule to the parties regarding the service and filing of written representations. As of today, I have not received a response, and am ready to proceed with the assessment on the basis of the proceedings in the record. [3] The fees are fixed at $2,250 for the services rendered under items 2 (7 units), 13 (5 units) 14 (3 units x 1 h 15 min.), 25 (1 unit) and 26 (2 units) of Tariff B. The claim under item 27 is denied, as there is nothing in the respondent’s bill of costs to justify it. I also reduced the number of units for the assessment of costs to two, since this is a simple, uncontested matter. [4] The disbursements of $255.11, which have been established by affidavit, are allowed as claimed. [5] In light of the foregoing, the respondent’s costs are fixed in the amount of $2,505.11, and a certificate is issued for that amount. MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC, THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2006 Signed: “Michelle Lamy” MICHELLE LAMY ASSESSMENT OFFICER Certified true translation Mary Jo Egan, LLB FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-734-05 BETWEEN: SERGE EWONDE Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent WRITTEN ASSESSMENT OF COSTS PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal, Quebec REASONS OF MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER DATED: October 6, 2006 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Catherine Fournier Drummondville, Quebec FOR THE APPLICANT John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca
Klouvi c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 80