Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2005

Ates v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)

2005 FCA 322
ImmigrationJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Ates v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2005-10-05 Neutral citation 2005 FCA 322 File numbers A-592-04 Decision Content Date: 20051005 Docket: A-592-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 322 CORAM: LINDEN J.A. NADON J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: ERKAN ATES Appellant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 5, 2005. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 5, 2005. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: SHARLOW J.A. Date: 20051005 Docket: A-592-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 322 CORAM: LINDEN J.A. NADON J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: ERKAN ATES Appellant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 5, 2005.) SHARLOW J.A. [1] Despite the able submissions of counsel for the appellant, we are not persuaded that the judgment of the Federal Court (2004 FC 1316) is based on an error of law or any other error that warrants the intervention of this Court. The certified question is: In a country where military service is compulsory, and there is no alternative thereto, do repeated prosecutions and incarcerations of a conscientious objector for the offence of refusing to do his military service, constitute persecution based on a Convention refugee ground? [2] We would answer this question in the negative. This appeal will be dismissed. "K. Sharlow" J.A. FEDERAL COU…

Read full judgment
Ates v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2005-10-05
Neutral citation
2005 FCA 322
File numbers
A-592-04
Decision Content
Date: 20051005
Docket: A-592-04
Citation: 2005 FCA 322
CORAM: LINDEN J.A.
NADON J.A.
SHARLOW J.A.
BETWEEN:
ERKAN ATES
Appellant
and
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
Respondent
Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 5, 2005.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 5, 2005.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: SHARLOW J.A.
Date: 20051005
Docket: A-592-04
Citation: 2005 FCA 322
CORAM: LINDEN J.A.
NADON J.A.
SHARLOW J.A.
BETWEEN:
ERKAN ATES
Appellant
and
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 5, 2005.)
SHARLOW J.A.
[1] Despite the able submissions of counsel for the appellant, we are not persuaded that the judgment of the Federal Court (2004 FC 1316) is based on an error of law or any other error that warrants the intervention of this Court. The certified question is:
In a country where military service is compulsory, and there is no alternative thereto, do repeated prosecutions and incarcerations of a conscientious objector for the offence of refusing to do his military service, constitute persecution based on a Convention refugee ground?
[2] We would answer this question in the negative. This appeal will be dismissed.
"K. Sharlow"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-592-04
APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OR AN ORDER FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA DATED OCTOBER 12, 2004, FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA FILE NUMBER IMM-150-04
STYLE OF CAUSE: ERKAN ATES and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa, Ontario
DATE OF HEARING: October 5, 2005
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: LINDEN J.A.
NADON J.A.
SHARLOW J.A.
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: SHARLOW J.A.
APPEARANCES:
Mike Bell
FOR THE APPELLANT
Catherine A. Lawrence
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Bell, Unger, Riley, Morris
Ottawa, Ontario
FOR THE APPELLANT
John H. Sims, Q.C.
Deputy Attorney General
Ottawa, Ontario
FOR THE RESPONDENT

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases