R. v. Jean et al.
Court headnote
R. v. Jean et al. Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1980-03-19 Report [1980] 1 SCR 400 Judges Laskin, Bora; Martland, Ronald; Ritchie, Roland Almon; Dickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; McIntyre, William Rogers; Chouinard, Julien On appeal from Alberta Subjects Criminal law Evidence Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada R. v. Jean et al., [1980] 1 S.C.R. 400 Date: 1980-03-19 Her Majesty The Queen Appellant; and Lawrence Jean and Daniel Howard Piesinger Respondents. 1980: March 19. Present: Laskin C.J. and Martland, Ritchie, Dickson, Beetz, McIntyre and Chouinard JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALBERTA, APPELLATE DIVISION Evidence—Wiretapping—Conversation between husband and wife intercepted by police—Private communications between persons not specifically named in order authorizing interception—Inadmissibility—Criminal Code, s. 178.16(5). Conspiracy—Possession of stolen property—Absence of guilty knowledge on part of co‑accused—Charge of conspiracy to possess stolen property—Acquittal. APPEAL by the Crown from a judgment of the Supreme Court of Alberta, Appellate Division[1], dismissing an appeal from the acquittal of the accused on a charge of conspiracy to possess stolen property. Appeal dismissed. J. Watson, for the appellant. M.G. Stevens-Guille, for the respondents. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by THE CHIEF JUSTICE—We do not need to hear you Mr. Stevens-Guille. We are not satisfied that we should reverse the judgment of the Albert…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
R. v. Jean et al. Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1980-03-19 Report [1980] 1 SCR 400 Judges Laskin, Bora; Martland, Ronald; Ritchie, Roland Almon; Dickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; McIntyre, William Rogers; Chouinard, Julien On appeal from Alberta Subjects Criminal law Evidence Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada R. v. Jean et al., [1980] 1 S.C.R. 400 Date: 1980-03-19 Her Majesty The Queen Appellant; and Lawrence Jean and Daniel Howard Piesinger Respondents. 1980: March 19. Present: Laskin C.J. and Martland, Ritchie, Dickson, Beetz, McIntyre and Chouinard JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALBERTA, APPELLATE DIVISION Evidence—Wiretapping—Conversation between husband and wife intercepted by police—Private communications between persons not specifically named in order authorizing interception—Inadmissibility—Criminal Code, s. 178.16(5). Conspiracy—Possession of stolen property—Absence of guilty knowledge on part of co‑accused—Charge of conspiracy to possess stolen property—Acquittal. APPEAL by the Crown from a judgment of the Supreme Court of Alberta, Appellate Division[1], dismissing an appeal from the acquittal of the accused on a charge of conspiracy to possess stolen property. Appeal dismissed. J. Watson, for the appellant. M.G. Stevens-Guille, for the respondents. The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by THE CHIEF JUSTICE—We do not need to hear you Mr. Stevens-Guille. We are not satisfied that we should reverse the judgment of the Alberta Appellate Division or interfere with the rulings and conclusions of the trial judge. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Appeal dismissed. Solicitor for the appellant: J. Watson, Edmonton. Solicitor for the respondents: M.G. Stevens-Guille, Edmonton. [1] (1979), 46 C.C.C. (2d) 176, 7 C.R. (3d) 338.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca
R v Brown
[2022] 1 SCR 506