Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2001

Canada (Attorney General) v. Laurin

2001 FCA 59
AdministrativeJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Canada (Attorney General) v. Laurin Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2001-03-13 Neutral citation 2001 FCA 59 File numbers A-784-99 Decision Content Date: 20010313 Docket: A-784-99 Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 59 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. SHARLOW J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant - and - PAULINE LAURIN Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, Tuesday, March 13, 2001 Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on Tuesday, March 13, 2001 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A. Date: 20010313 Docket: A-784-99 Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 59 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. SHARLOW J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant - and - PAULINE LAURIN Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario on Tuesday, March 13, 2001) ROTHSTEIN J.A. _. We have not been persuaded that the Umpire erred in a manner that would justify this Court interfering with its decision. _. The application for judicial review is dismissed with costs to the Respondent in the sum of $100.00. "Marshall Rothstein" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record DOCKET: A-7843-99 STYLE OF CAUSE: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant - and - PAULINE LAURIN Respondent DATE OF HEARING: TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 2001 PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A. Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario on Tuesday, March 13, 2001 A…

Read full judgment
Canada (Attorney General) v. Laurin
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2001-03-13
Neutral citation
2001 FCA 59
File numbers
A-784-99
Decision Content
Date: 20010313
Docket: A-784-99
Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 59
CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
SHARLOW J.A.
MALONE J.A.
BETWEEN:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Applicant
- and -
PAULINE LAURIN
Respondent
Heard at Toronto, Ontario, Tuesday, March 13, 2001
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario,
on Tuesday, March 13, 2001
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
Date: 20010313
Docket: A-784-99
Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 59
CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
SHARLOW J.A.
MALONE J.A.
BETWEEN:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Applicant
- and -
PAULINE LAURIN
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario
on Tuesday, March 13, 2001)
ROTHSTEIN J.A.
_. We have not been persuaded that the Umpire erred in a manner that would justify this Court interfering with its decision.
_. The application for judicial review is dismissed with costs to the Respondent in the sum of $100.00.
"Marshall Rothstein"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record
DOCKET: A-7843-99
STYLE OF CAUSE: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Applicant
- and -
PAULINE LAURIN
Respondent
DATE OF HEARING: TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 2001
PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
OF THE COURT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario on Tuesday, March 13, 2001
APPEARANCES BY: Mr. André Chamberlain
For the Applicant
Ms. Pauline Laurin
For the Respondent on her own
behalf
SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Morris Rosenberg
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
For the Applicant
Ms. Pauline Laurin
13 Camille Street
Lafontaine, Ontario
R.R. 3
Penetanguishene
L9M 1R3
For the Respondent on her own behalf
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
Date: 20010313
Docket: A-784-99
BETWEEN:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF CANADA
Applicant
- and -
PAULINE LAURIN
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
OF THE COURT

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases