Segasayo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
Source text
Segasayo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2010-11-04 Neutral citation 2010 FCA 296 File numbers A-102-10 Decision Content Date: 20101104 Docket: A-102-10 Citation: 2010 FCA 296 CORAM: NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. MAINVILLE J.A. BETWEEN: MAXIMIN SEGASAYO Appellant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, on November 4, 2010. Judgment delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on November 4, 2010. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NOËL J.A. Date: 20101104 Docket: A-102-10 Citation: 2010 FCA 296 CORAM: NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. MAINVILLE J.A. BETWEEN: MAXIMIN SEGASAYO Appellant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on November 4, 2010.) NOËL J.A. [1] The Federal Court Judge, on the basis of his own reasoning, was not required to determine the question that he certified in order to dispose of the application for judicial review, which explains why he made no determination. It follows that this question does not give rise to a right of appeal (see Varela v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2009] F.C.J. No. 549). [2] Accordingly, the appeal will be dismissed. “Marc Noël” J.A. Certified true translation Francie Gow, BCL, LLB FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-102-10 (APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF THE FEDERAL COURT, DATED FEBRUARY 18…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Segasayo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2010-11-04 Neutral citation 2010 FCA 296 File numbers A-102-10 Decision Content Date: 20101104 Docket: A-102-10 Citation: 2010 FCA 296 CORAM: NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. MAINVILLE J.A. BETWEEN: MAXIMIN SEGASAYO Appellant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, on November 4, 2010. Judgment delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on November 4, 2010. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NOËL J.A. Date: 20101104 Docket: A-102-10 Citation: 2010 FCA 296 CORAM: NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. MAINVILLE J.A. BETWEEN: MAXIMIN SEGASAYO Appellant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on November 4, 2010.) NOËL J.A. [1] The Federal Court Judge, on the basis of his own reasoning, was not required to determine the question that he certified in order to dispose of the application for judicial review, which explains why he made no determination. It follows that this question does not give rise to a right of appeal (see Varela v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2009] F.C.J. No. 549). [2] Accordingly, the appeal will be dismissed. “Marc Noël” J.A. Certified true translation Francie Gow, BCL, LLB FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-102-10 (APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF THE FEDERAL COURT, DATED FEBRUARY 18, 2010, IN DOCKET IMM-3367-09) STYLE OF CAUSE: MAXIMIN SEGASAYO v. M.C.I. PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec DATE OF HEARING: November 4, 2010 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. MAINVILLE J.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH: November 4, 2010 APPEARANCES: Jacques Beauchemin FOR THE APPELLANT Michel Pépin FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Jacques Beauchemin FOR THE APPELLANT Myles J. Kirvan Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca
Klouvi c. Canada (Procureur général)
2024 CAF 80