Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2004

Pirau v. Canada

2004 FCA 112
AdministrativeJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Pirau v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2004-03-17 Neutral citation 2004 FCA 112 File numbers A-580-02 Decision Content Date: 20040317 Docket: A-580-02 Citation: 2004 FCA 112 CORAM: RICHARD C.J. NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: SANDA TOPALA PIRAU Applicant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, on March 16, 2004. Judgment delivered at Montréal, Quebec, on March 17, 2004. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT: NOËL J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: RICHARD C.J. PELLETIER J.A. Date: 20040317 Docket: A-580-02 Citation: 2004 FCA 112 CORAM: RICHARD C.J. NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: SANDA TOPALA PIRAU Applicant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT NOËL J.A. [1] This is an application for judicial review of a decision by Lamarre J.T.C.C. (2002-1359 (IT) I), who held that the applicant was living in a conjugal relationship with Samoila Pirau within the meaning of subsection 252(4) of the Income Tax Act. [2] The applicant argued, before us, that the relationship she had with Mr. Pirau was not akin to a conjugal relationship and that Lamarre J.T.C.C. erred in fact and in law in finding otherwise. [3] In my view, Lamarre J.T.C.C. identified, in her reasons, a number of factual elements that support her finding that there was a conjugal relationship, in light of factors sanctioned by the case law. Specifically, I have in mind the fact that the applicant and Mr. Pirau, despite the alleged failure of their marriage, shared the…

Read full judgment
Pirau v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2004-03-17
Neutral citation
2004 FCA 112
File numbers
A-580-02
Decision Content
Date: 20040317
Docket: A-580-02
Citation: 2004 FCA 112
CORAM: RICHARD C.J.
NOËL J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
BETWEEN:
SANDA TOPALA PIRAU
Applicant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, on March 16, 2004.
Judgment delivered at Montréal, Quebec, on March 17, 2004.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT: NOËL J.A.
CONCURRED IN BY: RICHARD C.J.
PELLETIER J.A.
Date: 20040317
Docket: A-580-02
Citation: 2004 FCA 112
CORAM: RICHARD C.J.
NOËL J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
BETWEEN:
SANDA TOPALA PIRAU
Applicant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
NOËL J.A.
[1] This is an application for judicial review of a decision by Lamarre J.T.C.C. (2002-1359 (IT) I), who held that the applicant was living in a conjugal relationship with Samoila Pirau within the meaning of subsection 252(4) of the Income Tax Act.
[2] The applicant argued, before us, that the relationship she had with Mr. Pirau was not akin to a conjugal relationship and that Lamarre J.T.C.C. erred in fact and in law in finding otherwise.
[3] In my view, Lamarre J.T.C.C. identified, in her reasons, a number of factual elements that support her finding that there was a conjugal relationship, in light of factors sanctioned by the case law. Specifically, I have in mind the fact that the applicant and Mr. Pirau, despite the alleged failure of their marriage, shared the same home. Both saw to the well-being of their children, and ensured their economic support.
[4] I would dismiss the application for judicial review with costs.
"Marc Noël"
J.A.
"I concur.
John D. Richard, C.J."
"I concur.
Denis Pelletier, J.A."
Certified true translation
Kelley A. Harvey, BA, BCL, LLB
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-580-02
STYLE OF CAUSE: SANDA TOPALA PIRAU
Applicant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec
DATE OF HEARING: March 16, 2004
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT: NOËL J.A.
CONCURRED IN BY: RICHARD C.J.,
PELLETIER J.A.
DATE OF REASONS: March 17, 2004
APPEARANCES:
Virginie Falardeau
FOR THE APPLICANT
Anne Poirier
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
STARNINO MOSTOVAC
Montréal, Quebec
FOR THE APPLICANT
MORRIS ROSENBERG
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Montréal, Quebec
FOR THE RESPONDENT

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases