Duncan v. The King
Court headnote
Duncan v. The King Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1945-06-04 Report [1945] SCR 748 Judges Rinfret, Thibaudeau; Kerwin, Patrick; Hudson, Albert Blellock; Taschereau, Robert; Estey, James Wilfred On appeal from British Columbia Subjects Criminal law Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Duncan v. The King, [1945] S.C.R. 748 Date: 1945-06-04 Duncan v. The King 1945: May 28; 1945: June 4. Present: Rinfret C.J. and Kerwin, Hudson, Taschereau and Estey JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA Criminal law—Dismissal by Court of Appeal of accused's appeal from conviction of theft—Dissenting opinion in that Court that there was no evidence to support conviction—Appeal to this Court dismissed. APPEAL by the accused from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia[1] dismissing (O'Halloran J.A. dissenting) his appeal from his conviction of unlawfully stealing a number of panel boxes and switches. D. J. McAlpine for the appellant. L. W. Brockington K.C. and G. F. Henderson for the respondent. THE COURT.—Assuming that the ground of Mr. Justice O'Halloran's dissenting opinion is that there was no evidence whatever upon which the Magistrate could convict and that, consequently, this Court has jurisdiction in the premises, we are clearly of opinion that there was evidence here on which the Magistrate could find that the accused was guilty. Therefore, the appeal should be dismissed. Appeal dismissed. Solicitor for the appellant: D. J. McAlpine. Soli…
Full judgment (source text)
Mirrored from decisions.scc-csc.ca — the linked original is authoritative.
Duncan v. The King Collection Supreme Court Judgments Date 1945-06-04 Report [1945] SCR 748 Judges Rinfret, Thibaudeau; Kerwin, Patrick; Hudson, Albert Blellock; Taschereau, Robert; Estey, James Wilfred On appeal from British Columbia Subjects Criminal law Decision Content Supreme Court of Canada Duncan v. The King, [1945] S.C.R. 748 Date: 1945-06-04 Duncan v. The King 1945: May 28; 1945: June 4. Present: Rinfret C.J. and Kerwin, Hudson, Taschereau and Estey JJ. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA Criminal law—Dismissal by Court of Appeal of accused's appeal from conviction of theft—Dissenting opinion in that Court that there was no evidence to support conviction—Appeal to this Court dismissed. APPEAL by the accused from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia[1] dismissing (O'Halloran J.A. dissenting) his appeal from his conviction of unlawfully stealing a number of panel boxes and switches. D. J. McAlpine for the appellant. L. W. Brockington K.C. and G. F. Henderson for the respondent. THE COURT.—Assuming that the ground of Mr. Justice O'Halloran's dissenting opinion is that there was no evidence whatever upon which the Magistrate could convict and that, consequently, this Court has jurisdiction in the premises, we are clearly of opinion that there was evidence here on which the Magistrate could find that the accused was guilty. Therefore, the appeal should be dismissed. Appeal dismissed. Solicitor for the appellant: D. J. McAlpine. Solicitor for the respondent: E. A. Dickie. [1] [1945] 2 W.W.R. 297.
Source: decisions.scc-csc.ca
R v Brown
[2022] 1 SCR 506