Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2005

Sleeman Brewing & Malting Co. Ltd. v. Anchor Brewing Co.

2005 FCA 170
TaxJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Sleeman Brewing & Malting Co. Ltd. v. Anchor Brewing Co. Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2005-05-09 Neutral citation 2005 FCA 170 File numbers A-152-04 Decision Content Date: 20050509 Docket: A-152-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 170 CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A. ROTHSTEIN J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: THE SLEEMAN BREWING & MALTING CO. LTD. Appellant and ANCHOR BREWING COMPANY Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on May 9th, 2005. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on May 9th, 2005. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A. Date: 20050509 Docket: A-152-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 170 CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A. ROTHSTEIN J.A. SHARLOW J.A. BETWEEN: THE SLEEMAN BREWING & MALTING CO. LTD. Appellant and ANCHOR BREWING COMPANY Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on May 9, 2005) ROTHSTEIN J.A. [1] We have not been persuaded that this Court should interfere with the discretionary decision of Hugessen J. dismissing the appellant's motion for summary judgment. The appeal will be dismissed with costs to the respondent of $10, 000.00 inclusive of fees, disbursements and GST. "Marshall Rothstein" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-152-04 STYLE OF CAUSE: THE SLEEMAN BREWING & MALTING CO. LTD. Appellant and ANCHOR BREWING COMPANY Respondent PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: MAY 9, 2005 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: (DESJARDINS, ROTHSTEIN, S…

Read full judgment
Sleeman Brewing & Malting Co. Ltd. v. Anchor Brewing Co.
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2005-05-09
Neutral citation
2005 FCA 170
File numbers
A-152-04
Decision Content
Date: 20050509
Docket: A-152-04
Citation: 2005 FCA 170
CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A.
ROTHSTEIN J.A.
SHARLOW J.A.
BETWEEN:
THE SLEEMAN BREWING & MALTING CO. LTD.
Appellant
and
ANCHOR BREWING COMPANY
Respondent
Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on May 9th, 2005.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on May 9th, 2005.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
Date: 20050509
Docket: A-152-04
Citation: 2005 FCA 170
CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A.
ROTHSTEIN J.A.
SHARLOW J.A.
BETWEEN:
THE SLEEMAN BREWING & MALTING CO. LTD.
Appellant
and
ANCHOR BREWING COMPANY
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on May 9, 2005)
ROTHSTEIN J.A.
[1] We have not been persuaded that this Court should interfere with the discretionary decision of Hugessen J. dismissing the appellant's motion for summary judgment. The appeal will be dismissed with costs to the respondent of $10, 000.00 inclusive of fees, disbursements and GST.
"Marshall Rothstein"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-152-04
STYLE OF CAUSE: THE SLEEMAN BREWING & MALTING CO. LTD.
Appellant
and
ANCHOR BREWING COMPANY
Respondent
PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO
DATE OF HEARING: MAY 9, 2005
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
OF THE COURT: (DESJARDINS, ROTHSTEIN, SHARLOW, JJ.A.)
DELIVERED FROM THE
BENCH BY: ROTHTEIN J.A.
APPEARANCES:
Kenneth D. McKay
FOR THE APPELLANT
Steven Garland
Kevin Graham
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
SIM, HUGHES, ASHTON, McKAY LLP
Barristers & Solicitors
Toronto, Ontario
FOR THE APPELLANT
SMART & BIGGAR
Barristers & Solicitors
Ottawa, Ontario
FOR THE RESPONDENT

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases